• Varpeggio@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Is anyone else mortified by how such an obvious and blatant attention grab can so easily captivate the attention of literally every circle of the internet?

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Not really. They made an actual flying car, and that’s just plain awesome.

      We know it’s an attention grab, that’s the entire point of doing a product demonstration. You’re not special for noticing that, in fact it’s so obvious most people don’t feel the need to comment on it.

      • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They made an actual flying car

        “flying” is doing a lot of those heavy lifting, like 2000kg lifting. It’s like saying Buzz Lightyear from Toys Story can fly.

        • MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          That space convertible shows that it was an actually car with seats and everything. All the clips I’ve seen showed a sealed cockpit and tinted windows. So it could have esially been an empty frame with is lighter to do those stunts with

          • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            18 minutes ago

            And smaller battery pack to compensate for the pressurised tank and a compliment for Melon Husk small dick.

      • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 hour ago

        10 seconds of hovering ain’t exactly flying. It would have been impressive if they framed it as these are the thrusters we’ve been working on to help land on Mars, heres what we can do with them on a car.

        Instead Musk just goes we can kick flip a car!!! The same presentation goes from interesting tech to eyerollingly cringe. Absolutely a cool tech but has no business being sold in a car road legal or not. It should stay a prototype tech demo.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    So this Tesla rocket flying car thing I’m hearing about is actually taken seriously?

    Like, actual human beings with brains actually believe this shit will happen? I mean, come on now… You have a brain, evolution given, please, use it?

    This is another musk thing. Elmo tells obvious lies, his groupies will repeat it as fact ad nauseum, the news sites will obviously publish said nonsense as fact because of course, and three weeks later people will have forgotten about the next bullshit lie from Elmo. Rinse and repeat, he has pulled this bullshit off dozens of times now and he keeps getting away with it. Other people would have been sued into the ground but Elmo? Nope. I guess the guy has charisma or something (the something doing all the lifting because claiming that musk has charisma is just idiotic)

  • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The Tesla flying car is clearly a Spectacle for Fools, but the gas being used is basically compressed air and doesn’t contribute to our greenhouse gas problem.

    There’s plenty of other aspects to this to make fun of that are factually accurate.

            • timochka@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              44 minutes ago

              If your gas is compressing itself, it’s creating a high-pressure environment in your, err, guts. That means it’s creating a lower-pressure area outside - i.e. you are sucking gas in to compress it.

              Farting or belching - i.e. ‘gas’ in American - is rapid /decompression/, not compression.

              (In practice, I think it’s rather more a case of gas is /created/ by biological means, i.e. it is not ‘compressing’ anything per se.)

              It’s possible that you suck more for not being able to take a joke, though.

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    176
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The caps are not attached to reduce our carbon footprint but to reduce overall pollution. I don’t like when people paint over such issues with a too-broad brush.

    Also what idiocy did Me-me-me-lon come up with now?

    • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I like the caps being attached because it means you can’t lose the cap. It didn’t even occur to me that it might have to do with littering

      • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Never in my life have I actually lost a cap, but I have been splashed in the face multiple times by those idiotic attached caps.

    • Jiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 hours ago

      He built a wannabe K.I.T.T., I mean the jumping, no talking luckily. Also as fake as K.I.T.T. Its only purpose was to push the stock, like always and to do anything but a compact, cost efficient EV for the masses.

      • ebc@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Have you looked at the price of a model 3 lately? They’re about the price of a moderately equipped Civic… You’re not wrong about the stock thing though

    • macniel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      ever wanted to drive on the ceiling, doing sick somersaults and corkscrews?

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    There is no way its legal for cars to fly around like that. The kill enough people on the ground I dont want them trying to kickflip over traffic.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Of course it’s not legal, even Tesla said so, why would this be something to question?

    • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The wildest part? It’ll (probably) kick flip over and into an accident; it’s not like the speed direction is going to change with those thrusters.

      You know, like games where you go left to avoid something and right into another object or pit.

  • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago
    1. Heard it was just compressed air?

    2. it’s about plastic pollution not carbon

    3. But like, still, yeah… “pLaStIc StRaWs”

    • GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It is just compressed air, though it’s an insane amount of energy stored in that form. The number that will actually have that function will be so small that it probably doesn’t matter, though the emissions of car-centric transport are absolutely crazy. give me more trains!

        • ebc@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Scott Manley estimated it at around 45kWh, so about 2/3 of a charge. Not that much energy in the grand scheme of things, but not anywhere near practical either.

          • GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ex4Qg-gkLNg&t=530

            By car battery standards, an absurdly large amount of energy. And it’s released in a pretty inefficient manner. So not a good plan for EV range.

            I don’t think you could reasonably use them on the road without harming people around you either (though Musk’s target audience may not be very concerned about that aspect).

            I think it works for track usage / showing off to your wealthy friends. I have no clue how the flying version would work control wise, as you’d need to plan the entire flight ahead of time so it could verify it’s possible (before you take off down the Grand Canyon and run out of gas a few seconds later). Probably one of the reasons it’s not being sold to everyone.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Tesla and other EV companies tend to have a bunch of carbon credits earned (from being EV companies) which they sell to polluters for the right to pollute.

      It earns EV companies a lot of money.

    • MutantTailThing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The attached bottle caps are pretty stupid, but people who get unreasonably angry about it are even worse.

      If the things piss people off so much, it barely take any effort to just pull them the fuck off the bottle.

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Attached caps are there for a purpose. They work. So no, they are not stupid.

        What is stupid is that comic which is completely misrepresenting what those attached caps are about to create a false hypocrisy to make fun of (about the caps probably even more than about the Tech bros).

        It is strange, to see how it is taking up the same anti-EU propaganda usually spread by Tech bros. The attached caps solve a problem and that is that caps are one of the largest trash types on beaches and in forests. They are such a big issue because due to the small size they are also laboursome to clean. Attached caps considerably reduce the number of separated caps and also of trash as a whole ending up there. They don’t really cost more, don’t need more resources and you can use them just as easily, if you are not completely incapable of adapting to change on a most fundamental level.

        • Thorry@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          9 hours ago

          And don’t forget, an animal is much less likely to eat a whole bottle with the cap attached than they are eating a bottle cap by mistake.

          It’s just a win all around and the people who get angry about them are just selfish assholes.

          • Jiral@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            9 hours ago

            It is really just the new banana myth really. Except that one could question trade quality standards maybe a bit more (but still have a hard time to argue how 27 different standards would be better than just one) but the caps really have just a lot of big advantages and basically no meaningful disadvantage. I mean, for those really phobic of attached caps, they can be easily removed if you are really into that.

        • REDACTED@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          9 hours ago

          So no, they are not stupid.

          The purpose was to reduce plastic pollution. According to latest data, across entire EU beverage industry, the plastic usage for attached caps is around 200,000 tonnes, equaling to around 381 million kg CO2 increase and that’s not even taking in mind how much re-fitting and throwing out perfectly good manufacturing machines costs.

          Initially I was supportive of this, but after experts around the EU started coming out about how bad of an idea this actually was… I don’t know man.

          • Jiral@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Your comment on CO2 makes no sense. First you are talking about the amount of plastic used for caps (without a reference to before) and then you are talking about a “CO2 increase”. Caps do not appear to be larger or heavier than before but what do I know.

            If I am not mistaken, the transition period was 5 years. So even for the worst case, no brand new mold had to be discarded because it all came so sudden. I would not be surprised if many had at least one change already during the transition time even without that regulation. Also tooling can be sold or transferred as well, if it is really still in such a good shape. Now, would have been a longer transition period, maybe 10 year, been better? Maybe.

            Your comment sounds like a very biased view of the industry that understandably wasn’t enthusiastic about it, as the only one benefiting from it was the environment, which doesn’t do anything for them, right?

      • macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I dunno, I actually quite like them when I’m on the go and order a bottled drink, no way to lose the cap :)

        • rmuk@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Honestly when I first encountered one I hadn’t heard of the regulatory reasons for it and I just thought, “oh, neat”. I wonder how many people who complain about them were prevented from forming their own opinions by being told to hate it first.

          • macniel@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I wonder how many people who complain about them were prevented from forming their own opinions by being told to hate it first.

            That’s what I wonder about many many things these days.

  • Tenthrow@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Billionaires have no fucks to give about anything except mean tweets. They weirdly seem to care a hell of a lot about those.

  • bungle_in_the_jungle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I don’t get the point of this comic tbh. I’m no Tesla apologist, but it’s compressed air. Besides we all know this is in no way really going to be widely available.

    • affenlehrer@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’m also pretty sure the demo car doesn’t have a heavy battery with the full range. Probably stripped down to the absolute minimum weight to pull off these stunts

        • Goodeye8@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          To be fair that’s probably by design. The demo roadster uses McMurty fan style or “active downforce”. How it works is that it sucks the air out from under the car creating a low pressure chamber under the car which makes the outside pressure force the car closer to the ground creating a lot of downforce and traction.

          The fan design also made an appearance in F1 where it won a race and got instantly banned.

    • [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      All of the energy used to create a stupid car kickflip is for something completely useless and waste of resources that are most likely polluting. That is being contrasted with the attached cap that is forced on people to reduce pollution while the rich fucks do whatever they want.

  • Is he starting his own rocket league? Did one of his brood start playing it and leon thought, “I could do that!”?

    To be fair, leon has the most advanced thruster/sensor tech on the planet via SpaceX. Making an empty metal box do a flip is trivial.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    is that bottle thing a real thing? I noticed that on some of my recent water bottles and I’ve got to say, I’m absolutely livid about it.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah, because they’re obviously dumping a lot of engineering money into it, but it’s something that will never be practical, will probably never be legal to use on actual roads, and will never sell in any significant numbers.

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Meanwhile the Chinese elites are flying around in personal drones. Actual flying vehicles.

        In comparison the Tesla demo is like tying a horse to the front of a locomotive to show off the fastest horse in the world.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      And you should be! Stock got a solid bump from this idiot demo and then dropped below opening price. :)

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Most Tesla investors are the kind to be impressed by such a stunt.

      Musk made his fortune showing shiny things and making false promises to investors.

  • MedicsOfAnarchy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I pity my EMS brothers who will roll up on a car crash, that now has a massive pipe bomb to spray bits of flaming lithium in a half mile radius.

    Well done Tesla. The Mother of All Car Bombs will be ready to roll off the lot next year you say?

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Why is this car being called a Roadster? It doesn’t even appear to have a removable top. That would make it a coupé.

    I am beyond sick of auto manufacturers removing the convertible option. Stop taking all the fun out of cars!

  • KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    can’t build a car that drives itself because it crashes and kills people and wants to amaze us with this dog and pony show of a car that can fly out of control and REALLY kill a lot of people. Fucking excellent job heir musk. Is this what you’ve been wasting billions of our tax dollars on? This bullshit? Hey, while we’re on the subject, did you finally stop killing monkeys and (later on) the unfortunate Mexican immigrant who came across your Texas property? That brain chip thing. You killed a LOT of critters with that one. And Mars. Fuck’s sake. Idiot talk from start to finish - and yet, MORE of our tax dollars for that dog and pony show.

    and you want us to believe this tripe too?

    Oh, and before you go sulk - what’s the ‘gas mileage’ like? Five minutes? Two?

    OUR goddam tax dollars for THIS shit.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      heir musk

      You mean herr musk, heir musk is whatever little crotchspawn he picks to take over his shitheel legacy

  • becausechemistry@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The point is that there are tons of consumer products being made annoying so we can all feel like we’re doing our part. Meanwhile, the people generating the most pollution continue to do so.

    Sure, it was compressed air. But the power required to compress the ~3 seconds of air thrusters could have driven an electric car for over a hundred miles.