Every time I do it makes me laugh.
I spent some time making that meme, and I am very pleased that I did!
Lmao
How can you even begin to critique other nations/continents safety with a gun death record like theirs.
No other first world-adjacent nation that is not currently actively engaged in a actual boots on the ground warfare gets even remotely close to being this bad.
Because reality doesn’t actually matter for these narratives.
Because if they turn the EU into MEGA land then Trump’s cronies will make a pretty penny.
Fucking Albania already bend the knee. Kushner is going to tear down a nature reserve to build a resort in Albania
Edi Rama already sold out Albania to make Giorgia Meloni look good
Shit, this was the picture I was looking for but couldn’t find.
He wasn’t assassinated. He was just shot in a school shooting is all.
Interesting thing to say about Europe. Let’s see what your husband has to say about this.
You need a Luigi board to communicate with murdered assholes.
Waluigi!
“Counting or not counting gang violence?”
-dies-
Pro life hypocrite
Clint Eastwood accepts your challenge
Wasn’t her own husband assassinated in broad daylight on American soil under President Trump?
Counterpoint: America is probably slightly safer without Charlie Kirk’s rhetoric.
What did he say that wasnt safe?
“We must also be real. We must be honest with the population. Having an armed citizenry comes with a price, and that is part of liberty…I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights.”
He was also against 2SLGBTQI+ people
And he has said many things that are straigh up racist. So yeah, good riddance to him. May he rest in piss
They really just say whatever in pursuit of their goals. Conservatives should not be taken seriously. They’re dishonest, cognitive hazards.
Im sorry to uhm akschually you but a cognitive hazard is anything that’s dangerous when perceived with (at least) one of the senses (I.e. upon seeing something),
but this is actually a infohazard, something that’s only dangerous upon being understood (like a instruction manual on how to build a bomb, which wouldn’t bee dangerous in the hands of a fish for example)Technically correct, the best kind of correct.
Eh, he was kinda right the first time: the less capable you are at critical thinking (I.e. understanding what they’re actually doing), the more vulnerable you are to their bullshit.
Yeah but obviously a bunch of people just lap this stuff up.
Once you buy into the cult a whole bunch of cognitive biases & fallacies kick in to keep you in; sunk cost, conservativism bias, false consensus, confirmation bias, anchoring, etc they get all the falluses
Mostly Faux News Red Hats.
Cognitive hazard? Someone should Secure and Contain them to Protect normal people
The party of 1984. They couldn’t possibly adhere to it any closer.
In this way every prediction made by the Party could be shown by documentary evidence to have been correct, nor was any item of news, or any expression of opinion, which conflicted with the needs of the moment, ever allowed to remain on record. All history was a palimpsest, scraped clean and reinscribed exactly as often as was necessary.
Orwell, 1984
They just make shit up like what actually happened or what they said before never existed.
Orwell, 1984, 1948
I’ll see myself out.
Just the other day I was shot while advocating for increased gun violence.
Good for you! Keep up the good fight and stuff
Did some random person claim that he shot you? Then after he was arrested they found out he didn’t shoot you, but he had pedo porn on his laptop so they arrested him for that. I don’t know what’s real anymore.
I don’t think he was advocating for it. It was more of a disingenuous ‘we’ve tried nothing and are all out of ideas’.
I personally think that is worse.
Yes of course it has. Trust me, I’m here. No need to confirm yourself. There are criminals everywhere. Just trust me.
See you’d think that’d work, but the US kidnapped the democratically elected Venezuelan president while committing horrific war crimes that if any other country did it the US would immediately invade for doing, all over the fact ‘the country was full of criminals.’
So really ErCIA Kirk is just laying the propaganda framework for an invasion of Europe by the US.
The problem is that the pretense doesn’t even have to actually have any basis in reality
This. Its not as through Venezuela was invaded because they were insufficiently rigorous in proving the US’s statements wrong. The US was going to do that anyway
EuRoPe Is NoT sAfE!
Meanwhile in the USA: I need to own a gun to defend myself!
And later she had to run for her life on that party.
Why does the MAGA movement have those idiot blondes everywhere? The white house press bitch, Mrs. Kirk,…
They all want to get into Trump’s good graces by emulating his favorite look on a woman: that of the teenage daughter that he pretty much openly bragged about raping
Obviously it’s more complicated than only this one thing, but the most compelling theory I’ve heard about it basically goes: if you want to be a prominent woman in the maga movement you have to prove that you accept that you are inferior and not threatening to the men, by playing up this extreme and debasing kind of hyper femininity. In Bed with the Right has a great episode about this and some related ideas.
MAGA women want to be defined by their relationship to a man: daughters, wives, mothers, widows.
Intelligent independent women wouldn’t support MAGA, and they promote the blonde white women because they are white-supremacists.
I’m perpetually surprised that the hot chick on Gutfeld! is a brunette.
That’s okay, conservatives want the blonde at home and in media, but they actually prefer to mack on women from outside their ranks as those are often perceived as more interesting and fun.
By a trump voter no less
