MAYBE if they Fired MORE Workers and RAISE Prices of their Cars all those Unemployed People can Purchase their Vehicles? Have they tried THAT yet?
Stellantis will remember this.
He has been thinking about replacing his 2020 Ford F-150 pickup truck
Just… wtf… Your car is only 6 years old and it’s just so old that you really think to need to replace it? And your story is so relatable it lands in an article? How much difference can you even see between that 2020 and a 2026 model really?
He needs more surveillance in his truck.
I suspect it’s media lying again, in order to normalize replacing vehicles more often.
I don’t think it’s lying, I was in a lot in 2022 looking at a used 2021 with like 8k miles on it and wondered what they got bought after trading in. The guy said that he actually bought a 2022 of the exact same model, because he didn’t want to be seen driving anything but the current years model.
They certainly exist and can be found to quote, just seems out of touch to treat the situation as somehow “worrying” enough to make the cut. Figured you probably could have found someone with at least a decade old car to comment…
“I don’t want to be seen driving last years model” Rolls the $36k he still owns on that old truck into the $100k loan on the new one.
Nah, the guy is probably badly upside down on the loan, and the truck is depreciating so fast he won’t be able to roll the loan/trade-in over into another truck.
If they are a frequent driver, they could be putting 20k-25k a year on their truck. Like yeah I wouldn’t want a Ford with 120k miles on it either.
Yeah in 15 months I’ve put 35k on my car 😭😭 let’s not talk about what I’ve put on my work truck…
I mean, it’s a Ford tho.
Surprisingly, a majority of Fords made in the 90’s are still on the road today!
…It’s simply not worth the expense to haul them away. XD
Jk
How much difference can you even see between that 2020 and a 2026 model really?
I wonder if it was manufactured in that weird sweet (bitter?) spot where “supply chain issues” made everyone use cheaper parts and forego many chip-based components entirely.
So they’re responding by making more affordable, efficient vehicles, right? Adopting new technology, right? Right?
Seriously, all they have to do is make an EV or hybrid under $20k and not try to push subscription BS.
But how will they make money next quarter if you spend money on them this quarter only???
People need to understand that money sitting around in a savings account is bad for the economy. You owe it to your country to be in debt. /s
businessman try not to peddle subscriptions challenge (level impossible)
No. Buy a ferd f150000 to stomp your neighbors and make liberals cry! Go on TOUGH mountain trails with 18 row seating and 13000 lbs of Karen fuelled road rage!
*note can only carry 1 person 99% of the time. Cannot touch a non asphalt road or warranty void. Must kill at least 3 cyclists/children monthly due to 0 visibility.
Just sign up for this $1,800 per month loan for the next 90 months.
Houses were more affordable than this when I was a kid.
No, they want everyone to have more money to give to them…
Reminded me of a UAW spokesperson being interviewed on tariffs…
When asked why he had advocated for auto tariffs before the tariffs came on, and now why was he complaining that the tariffs were unaffordable, his explanation was simple, he wanted tariffs only on the things that competed with them, and the rest of the economy left alone so that everything can be more affordable except the stuff they did.
They want to sell those high margin high priced cars and are grousing because the rest of the economy isn’t fueling the consumer budget enough to fulfill their ambitions.
“We build cars that are too expensive for most people to buy and we need that profit! What could we do?”
Even Henry Ford figured it out, a century ago.
Life in general has been unaffordable for awhile now.
Corporations pay stagnant wages, raise prices, funnel money out of the economy to shareholders who hoard wealth, and then get worried when there’s no one left who can buy their products?
Tell me again why we think C-Suite folks are smart?
Right, because they’ll get bailed out again and stay rich. That’s why.
It’s a god damn disgrace.
I’m sure someone will come around and tell me how complicated economics is and why we should trust business and industry leaders who went to school for this sort of thing, like basic pattern recognition and common sense couldn’t have predicted that people who can barely afford groceries would stop buying cars…
Fuck.
Thanks the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993
Think you pretty much nailed it.
Tell me again why we think C-Suite folks are smart?
Some weird fetiziation that financial accumen is somehow the ultimate mark of intelligence above all else.
The auto industry is worried
I mean, they have the power to reduce the price. 🤷♂️
But then the line won’t go up as much and the CEO won’t get his bonus :(
And it would just be uncouth if the CEO couldn’t buy another yacht to go with his new mansion this year.
Literally the same day this article was published, Hyundai decided to cancel their electric sedan in favor of an SUV-only lineup.
Crazy, because I’ve been praising them for their aesthetic design (polygonal angles done right, proving the kampfwagon didn’t ruin it for everyone) and cool electrics and wishing I could’ve got one, but…yeah.
The U.S car sitch is such a tragic joke.
Any cars out there under 30k that are completely manual and don’t have a screen, that I can repair myself? No? Well, I’ll never buy a new car then, fuck you automakers.
We had millions of those types of cars 20 years ago, now they’re nonexistent.
I’ll even get an electric if its completely analog. But they refuse to do that even though it takes very very little effort. An electric car is (mostly) a voltage regulator a motor and a battery. Its not hard people.
don’t have a screen
Its not legal to make that car anymore in Canada/USA and likely other places. They are mandated to have a backup camera all over the place.
EU mandates an SOS call function as well, so a data connection is also basically mandatory.
Is it though?
I don’t suppose I know the EU situation, but at least in the US, cellular towers are supposed to accept an emergency call regardless of anything like a SIM susbscription, so if the car doest uses a cellular modem to dial emergency ervices, the car wouldn’t necessarily actually need a subscription active.
Maybe it doesn’t work that way in EU, but it seems like it should be the case that a mandatory emergency call function shouldn’t carry a subscription burden.
The moment you spend the money putting in a cellular connection that can make a call (SOS) and be connected to a mic and speaker system, you start asking how can we recoup that cost.
We already have a backup screen mandated by law.
We can show maps on it and stream music from their favorite music service!
You can put that extra stuff behind a paid sub.
Most will have an active subscription even if you aren’t using it, because it’s cheaper to have basically a bulk subscription service than to administer single accounts.
Doesn’t apply to motorbikes, and they get crazy high fuel efficiency to cars.
If you want to raise your chances of dying substantially over a backup camera you can go right ahead. Please sign your organ donor card first though.
I normally cycle instead. Even fewer regulations and taxes.
Cycling is great ya. Every city should be working towards adding more and more cycling infrastructure.
A lot of people will complain, but its worth it.
I’ll cycle with or without it, I don’t really have a choice. Gotta buy food.
There used to be a car like that, could get a manual and you could fix it yourself - on the rare occasion it needs work.
It was the 2014-2024 Mitsubishi Mirage, and the entire US made fun of it. That’s what happens when someone makes a cheap, dependable, simple car in the US, people act like it’s the worst vehicle ever made because you can see exposed screw heads when you open the door.
That sounds freaking rad to me. I want an open source car standard so bad. Exposed screwheads, teardowns galore, commonly available parts.
I’d even learn manual. I hear they’re fun.
The biggest con is we’ve been trained to see vehicles as fashion and status statements rather than their utility.
Putting one of those together would be a pretty awesome highschool shop class.
Sometimes a strange car will gain a sort of “cult” following, and that’s when you sometimes end up with a situation like you describe, where parts are made by many different 3rd parties. I have an old Japanese 4x4 that was so awesome that Mopar had to team up with consumer reports and the government to kill it. It’s 30+ years old and I can get parts for it as easily as I can an F150.
Notable past and current examples of this include:
Chevy Corvair
Geo Metro
Harley-davidson anything
Jeep wrangler
Suzuki Samurai
Toyota Supra
Edit: formatting are hard
The things you seem to think are making cars more expensive, are actually the cost-cutting measures.
The screen is cheaper than a myriad of buttons. Which is literally why Ferrari hired Apple’s Jony Ive to design their upcoming EV’s interior… with physical controls (it’ll still have a screen, but the important features have buttons and knobs and shit and they’ll be made of metal and/or glass). To stand out from the crowd, as even premium manufacturers are using cheapo touchscreens instead of making proper interiors anymore.
As for “completely manual”, if you mean manual transmission, those are gone because of low demand and the fact that it just costs more to support multiple options. Plus modern autos can actually be incredible. If you actually listen to the transmission manufacturer NOT the car manufacturer for maintenance schedules, they last longer than the clutch tends to do on most manuals and while a clutch job is easier than an auto trans rebuild, it’s still not easy. Either one is going to total a 20 year old car for most people (not you or me if we work on our own cars, of course). Oh and automatic transmissions are now more fuel efficient than mediocre drivers with manual transmissions (not necessarily as fuel efficient as great drivers with manual transmissions though).
Anyway, screens themselves aren’t bad. The best car I ever owned was (admittedly not under 30k new, but under 30k when I got it used) a 2019 Mercedes C-Class which had a nice screen with Apple Carplay and Android Auto support, but NO touch. There were physical buttons for everything you’d generally want, and you could control the screen with either the rotary knob, the touchpad in front of the armrest, or the steering wheel buttons. But you literally could NOT finger the screen itself to do anything. They changed that with the next generation a few years later, unfortunately. But for me this was perfect because I had a way to control navigation and the music on my phone that did not involve looking at my phone, or interacting with a touch screen.
In fact I don’t think any of these features are what makes cars more expensive compared to 20-30 years ago. Screens are cheap now. Automatic everything has been figured out already, the R&D costs for most things already recuperated. It’s the size creep if anything. They’ll sell exclusively crossovers and SUVs because these are “premium” and margins are better. And even “small” cars, if they still exist, are bigger than the same model used to be. Oh and let’s not forget that if you’re in the US, everything needs to have like 500 horsepower now, while emissions and fuel efficiency goals dictate smaller engines, so everything HAS to have a turbo now.
In Europe, cheap cars still exist, though they’ve doubled in price over the last 2 decades (but what hasn’t). You CAN still get a Dacia Sandero for 15k. It’s so bare bones that to inflate the list of installed equipment, they list things like “fuel tank cap” and “front seat belts” among others. Even that comes with a 10" touch screen as standard because it’s just so cheap to add one and it’s much easier for them to design than a classic head unit with buttons.
A friend of mine’s first assignment as a senior engineer was to find ways to eliminate more moving parts and metal fasteners from cheaper spec products, because removing a dozen two cent screws would save the company tens of millions over the life of the design. Not just in parts, but because they’re more complicated and take longer to install than just snapping and glueing a plastic shell together.
With the scale of manufacturing at companies like GM and Ford, saving a few thousand per car on parts and labor with a touchscreen infotainment system is a massive, massive amount of money. The R&D costs of converting from knobs to touchscreens would probably be covered in the first few months.
Precisely. And keep in mind that the buttons and knobs would usually be different on the different models, but with the touchscreen OS you have one OS you keep developing and just hide some of the features in some of the models. So there’s less model-specific R&D and more common R&D for all products
Also maintenance is cheaper when you reduce things that can break, so lower warranty costs as well.
It’s the size creep if anything
I don’t know. My brother works for a legacy manufacturer and claims the difference in material cost between small and large vehicles is minimal. Assembly cost is far more than material cost. He used this to justify why they couldn’t make a small truck: it’s equally complex to assemble and the materials cost difference is minimal so they couldn’t make it enough cheaper that anyone would buy it.
Up to you whether to buy the company line but that’s the claim
I drive a 2013 Miata with 6 speed manual rear wheel drive configuration and it has no tracker and no screen.
sounds like you want a miata
I have a 99 loll. Peak car
Is there anything like a miata for bigger people? One of these days I plan to own a home and would love a project car. People always seem to suggest a miata because they are cheapish, repairable, and have a huge community modding them. The problem? I am 6"4’. Maybe I could go with a convertible miata and wear goggles.
Slate promises to be analog
It’s all those blasted safety features! In my day we died every weekend, and we turned out fine!
There is a paradox with safety features that is really interesting: the safer you make roads, the more aggressive people drive. Better breaks led to people tailgating more aggressively. Better crumble zones has led to bigger and heavier cars. It’s almost like there is a threshold of risk that people naturally gravitate to and that maybe the best way to improve traffic safety is through education
A professor at my university wrote a book called Navigating Environmental Attitudes, and he titled a chapter, “Educating the Public… and Other Disasters”. TL; DR: It doesn’t work.
That’s why I advocate for a big, metal spike on the steering wheel, pointed at the driver’s chest. (Okay, or designing the roads so that they feel unsafe, so drivers naturally slow down and pay attention.)
I remember reading a study about speeding in neighborhoods. It’s not unusual to have people driving 50+ in a 25 MPH neighborhood.
Speed bumps actually caused people to drive faster between the bumps.
What worked was more curves and narrow roads. Essentially making it more dangerous.
So you’re not wrong.
deleted by creator
I’ve done the experiments myself. The street that I live on is a rat-run, on which drivers speed through a residential neighborhood with lots of bicyclists, kids, people walking dogs, students walking to school, and the like. The street is ridiculously wide, enough for four vehicles to squeeze by.
So I sometimes park my vehicle on the street. (I bike to work, and most other places.) That visual narrowing of the street is enough to slow them down a bit. The best day was when the people across the street had contractors in, and they parked their trucks on the street while I parked my vehicle on my side. There was still room for two vehicles to squeeze by (and the bus drivers would YOLO it through), but it felt so narrow that most people would stop for oncoming traffic, and take turns through the cataract.
(Okay, or designing the roads so that they feel unsafe, so drivers naturally slow down and pay attention.)
This can be as simple as drawing disorienting lines on the road.
Or choosing a width and windiness to achieve desired speeds, fill the reclaimed space with bike lanes and parking or bus stops or gardens or playgrounds in the widest parts
deleted by creator
Yes. People are much worse at driving now mostly due to phones, but so because they’ve never driven a miata on public highways.
So improve safety by replacing airbags with nail bombs?
deleted by creator
In order to have an effect, the driver has to know about the danger.
Not just that it’s unaffordable but I’m not paying 60k for a car with a porcelain transmission that needs monthly software updates that might just brick the thing.
“Porcelain transmission” sent me.
Don’t forget the oil pumps driven by rubber belts that need half the engine disassembled to replace it.
This! When I was 16 I bought a P.O.S. Buick for 600 bucks. I did all the normal maintenance myself in my driveway. Oil, pads, filters, belts… Seems like you need a special tool for each part on new cars if you can even get to the part to replace without taking half the engine out.
Even the fuckin battery was bolted down with a long bracket that needed a special 18 inch socket extension to unfasten. Wtf
Wait till you hear about the BMW proprietary screws
It depends on the new car, I’ve found. A Mitsubishi Mirage is considerably easier to deal with than a BMW anything, because the people who designed the mirage had an eye toward maintenance because of the type of car it is. The BMW will go to the shop, while the Mirage will get it’s clutch changed in the driveway.
Almost like Capitalism isn’t sustainable, right?
Cars are luxuries.
Without public transportation they aren’t. When you live 20 miles from your job in Bumfuck, USA how do you get there without a vehicle?
Dude, I’m in the San Diego area. And if I had to rely on the bus, a simple grocery shopping trip would take at least 3 hours, not counting a mile and a half walk to and from the nearest stop. I did take a train and an express bus to work, because it happened to stop directly at my workplace.
No, they still are. You can always turn a luxury into a relative need by stretching out resource intensity. I could easily make the case for commuting with rockets from the Moon to Earth and back, or for some billionaire commuting with a private jet. Doesn’t make it not a luxury.
If you hate it, protest against the car system and suburbia, and for dense urban development with public transit. There is no alternative.
The auto industry is concerned about a problem of their own making? Shocking.
Nobody asked for a 100k pickup truck. Who wants to throw boards and chains in that?
You want a V8, air suspension and 10 speed auto - you’re paying $100k.
I don’t want air ride and I don’t want 10 speed auto. My father got a 2020 F350 with a 10 speed auto and it turned itself to gravel. It’s a POS that I’m hounding him to sell once it’s payed off. Who the fuck thought a press on timing gear was a good idea?
My father is a boomer and can be shamed into vanity purchases. That’s who’s speeding 100k on trucks.
I do not understand buying a truck unless you need to haul shit for work. As a passenger vehicle, trucks are idiotic.
I haul shit for work.
Then it’s a tool for business. Hope you’re writing that shit off too.
I want a 200hp 4x4 with sealed beam headlights.
I have a 65 HP 4x4 with sealed beam headlights…
They all sit on each others’ boards. There is no real competition.
This isn’t just a car problem. The problem is they won’t pay us enough, they know it, we know it. They’ll do anything to keep from paying us more than the absolute minimum they must. Inflation is just another word for greed. They’re going to keep pushing until the entire thing collapses, and then they’re going to go hide in their bunkers.
They’re going to keep pushing until the entire thing collapses, and then they’re going to go hide in their bunkers.
Which is SO weird. Because even if your bunker is luxurious as heck, why the heck would you prefer that over a functioning world to run amok in?
Especially if, worst case, all that wealth turns into nothing because it doesn’t readily convert to bottlecaps or something lol.
