I know there was some schism and moving of instances, but beyond that I can’t deduce what happened/is happening.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 年前

      Yeah I think the above comment is inappropriately tying the issue to a topic they specifically said wasn’t the motivation

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 年前

          “the misinformation is popular, despite those involved disregarding it. so I shall believe it.”

          ?

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 年前

              Their words are available on the topic and ada could easily refute them.

                • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 年前

                  I’ll admit: I took your original comment to indicate enjoyed consumption and propagation of mis truth. Your comment here seems to be more of an acknowledgement of the danger of misinformation.

                  Now I don’t know what to do lol

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 年前

      Correct. Nevertheless the neopronouns incident was something of a catalyst; all the “differences” had to do with trans issues in some way, and it would be amiss of me not to point out the biggest moment that made 196 come out in support of Ada and Blahaj.

      Their other “differences” are also bogus in my opinion.