I only use work hardware for work. I only use work networks for work. I have a cell phone off wifi for everything else

Not really the point of the post but sure, or directly relevant to my comment no contest with the options you laid out

Who brought up plastics?

That’s a bit of a leading question, as if I advocated for single use Plastic specifically.

I’m not a food health scientist so I’d leave it at: as a consumer I want whatever keeps people safe, and is of the least impactful material. Commonly that’s plastic, but as we see with glass bottles, options exist.

Op why don’t you suggest what an acceptable reply looks like? You’re pretty restricted on what type of advice you’re seeking. Maybe then folks can ad libs in the thing that will help.

I’m all for packaging minimization but I also acknowledge that if I, the consumer seek single serving products, I’m pretty glad they are food safe and isolated. This is the part where “reduce” in the recycling slogan can manifest: what’s the absolute minimum packaging needed to keep a consumer safe?

I’m not saying companies shouldn’t ever be responsible for their packaging waste, it’s a good idea. But I think municipal trash is meant to be that answer, in that rather than every company managing their own streams of returns, the locality does it, and sorts them by general type for efficiency/efficacy.

Therefore I think it best to factor waste costs from the company into that centralized system, so efficiencies of scale can manifest. This allows for better oversight and lower overall costs. The game is not allowing companies to be absent from this stage.

With acknowledgment that increased costs would land on the consumer one way or another, I’d conclude by saying centralized waste management needs to be better funded, and more sophisticated recycle/reuse systems implemented with those new funds.

And ultimately if you are trying to macgyver together anti drone tech you are beyond fucked and should have spent that energy pursuing other means of privacy.

Athletic golden is great.

But that doesn’t make sense, one beer a week is absolutely not triggering chemical addiction. At that rate you could attack any ritual behavior, or regular consumption of anything beyond nutrient paste and water

To me the important distinction is between chemical and behavioral addiction, habits and compulsions.

That sucks. I like to drink and also drink non alc drinks. I’d just ask your fave 0.0 or non alc derived beverages,maybe I’ll check em out

What about baseball and track?

Loser talk. Do you see the masturbatory way you are reveling in these negative responses? Will you acknowledge you are dwelling in hyper negativity, seemingly for the lulz?

The lack of understanding that indeed, you may struggle to control it, BUT YOU’RE STILL RESPONSIBLE FOR IT

My mind is busted, it looked like everyone rolled 8

The perception among idiots is that there’s a trade-off with performance

“look what I can DO!”

Every platform is like this

19/f/Cali always

You think a person’s worth is tied to their genes. Pretty yuck. I disagreed and explained how.

For the record I was calling YOU out for linking a person to their genes, just not directly, trying to be courteous to the conversation.

Keep replying now, and you’re just slapfighting. Not worth it. I said in the last comment our positions are well known and the conversation is functionally concluded.

It’s a bad gene. It’s literally the contextually appropriate description of a factor involved in a situation.

Sorry it hurts your feelings

We’ve both made our points and opinions known here.