• spitfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    No, because devices need to be compliant, there needs to be an unskipable deadline. Otherwise everyone would just defer.

    • Takapapatapaka@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Do they really imperatively need to be compliant ? (i genuinely don’t know, but it seems weird to me, it feels like i can just postpone updates indefinitely on linux)

      Or is this that it’s way better to be compliant, so companies need to enforce it on their computers (but individuals may not have this need) ?

      • spitfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can postpone them but it’s a risk. Companies try to mitigate risks, because they don’t want to get hacked or fined because they don’t follow regulation. And to be honest it’s in your best interest to be up to date too. It’s not such a pain in the ass to reboot your computer every once in a while :)

              • spitfire@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Updating is not as much PITA as you think they are, and it’s worth doing it. Obviously nothing will protect you fully, but the more frequently you update l, the safer you are.