• Zoot@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Oh I thought we were talking about the rich, the people who are at the point of paying negative taxes. Like the comment directly next to yours goes further into.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        to a point, then you pay $0 and after that, you actually get taxpayer money in goverment contracts.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The relevant metric is “proportionate” not “majority”. The working poor pay a much higher proportion of their earnings in taxes than the ultra rich.

      For example, our social security system is funded by taxes on the first $184,500 of personal income. Every dollar you earn above that is exempted from social security tax. That’s a 12.4% regressive flat tax. That tax is not assessed against business income, only personal income.

      • krisevol@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The working poor usually don’t pay federal taxes, and usually pay a -% if you include rebates or credits.

        The middle class on the other hand gets screwed in taxes.

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          They still pay a high percentage of their income in sales tax, and they ultimately pay their landlord’s property taxes. The middle class might see the highest taxes, but the working poor still pay proportionally more than the ultra-rich.