I’m for it.

Any form of advertising aside from maybe a press release to announce a new product/service, and also any form of commissioned sales.

Read more, watch fewer videos. Bonus: books cannot contain unskippable ads.

So that’s a solid “no” on having any argument at all besides “nuh uh!” And “I don’t like the way the things you’re saying makes me feel so ill dismiss them without actually addressing them”?

Your stance would be believable of you’d just ignored what I said. You felt the need to respond, but don’t have the capacity to respond to the substance. So you pick a line of hyperbole and argue passionately against that. It’d be funny if there weren’t 300 million people just like you helping destroy the world so they can go watch the game in peace.

And regardless the implication you’re making is that everyone not exactly aligned with you doesn’t care about the future and spends all their time doing frivolous shit.

Not everyone, just the ones who attend “protests” on weekends that have police permits and march with people carrying signs that say “If Kamala has won we’d be at brunch”.

Because we know that. You don’t understand what the problem is, so you let the people profiting from the problem convince you that the real problem is that the “good guys” lost the election rather than the fact that there are no good guys and the people selling the narrative steal a little more from you every administration regardless of which team of Wall St Fellating shitbags won the big game. Elections in the US are just more bread and circuses, the Epstein class owns both parties tip to tail.

Wants to avoid politics and uses “gay” as a perjorative. This user is either 12 or a Nazi. Possibly both, I suppose.

I love how you only ever respond to the vibe of something and not what was actually said, it’s so totally Schumerist.

If it’s got you out of your brunch spot and in the streets protesting US imperialism then it’s already done more than four years of Kopmala would have.

Must be, since you couldn’t address any of the actual substance of what I said and had to nit pick a bit of hyperbole.

They don’t "realize* it because it’s a bullshit lie made up to keep you in line.

The U.S. is an Oligarchy? The Research, Explained | RepresentUs https://share.google/MXhZo0M9yGusnEXmm

you are OK with terrorism. This is my total lack of surprise.

And you’re obviously ok with genocide, apartheid, and settler-colonialism. In comparison to that, “terrorism” isn’t that bad. Especially when it’s only “terrorism” when the victims fight back.

The system is not broken. It’s functioning exactly as intended.

who could’ve easily been denied power if people’s brains were operating at even 15% capacity.

No, who could’ve continued operating in the back rooms while their more polite servants get on TV and whinge about how there’s nothing they can do to improve things even with majorities in both houses and the Presidency. But at least they’d have the decency to keep the slurs in those back rooms and only murder brown kids so you could go back to brunch in peace.

We’ll stop that as soon as you purge all the traitors from your party who care more about fellating Wall St than starving kids, and care more about Israeli settlers apartheid health care than their own constituents dying in the streets. When both sides aren’t basically the same except for the ten or so designated culture war issues we’ll stop saying both sides are the same.

Pretty sure nobody who objected to Kopmala’s enthusiastic genocide support voted for Trump

Redirect some of that anger your boss and landlord told you to point left at the party who couldn’t come up with a candidate that could beat Trump, twice. Then save a little for all the happy, complacent Liberals who think that a quadrennial choice between “the untenable status quo” and “make everything worse” is a functional democracy worth saving or mourning.

America is a dictatorship of Capital, not a democracy. These actions are 100% in line with the interests of capital.

Since those are the only two ways most Anarchist “economics” can work, you’re probably not wrong.

I’ll be honest, my knee-jerk answer was “because it would be less profitable for the executives who never visit and are in no danger”. But then I read the article and:

Officials said the building has a fire suppression system, which was operating but was compromised when a portion of the roof collapsed.

Let’s TACO bout it.

If they choose the latter we’ll be sure to note next to the record of their conviction and hanging that they were just following orders.