• TachyonTele@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Yes. But it can be, and is used gender neutral. Words have multiple meanings all the time. Fuck is a great example. It has probably five or ten different uses.

    Niether of you are wrong

    • Fedegenerate@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      He/him was used gender neutrally too in instruction manuals. That doesn’t mean he/him is a gender neutral term.

      It doesn’t mean it’s right to use he/him as a gender neutral term. It doesn’t mean it’s right to refer to everyone as he/him. It means we’ve learned since then.

      Just an example, do you now think he/him is a gender neutral term? By all means tell the world that you think he/him is a gender neutral term.

      What’s easier to believe? He/him/dude are all gender neutral terms and your mum/wife/sister/best friend is a dude referred correctly to a he?

      Or that they’re gendered terms used incorrectly as we historically have already done so.

        • Fedegenerate@fedinsfw.app
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          I added a historical parallel “he/him” was claimed to be gender neutral. We’ve since learned. We can learn the lesson from the past and apply it forward, or not?

          So I did add something, but the point is true, I can merely repeat it and add context.