m_f@discuss.onlineM to Cyanide & Happiness@discuss.onlineEnglish · 1 day ago2026-06-01discuss.onlineimagemessage-square89linkfedilinkarrow-up1442arrow-down117file-text
arrow-up1425arrow-down1image2026-06-01discuss.onlinem_f@discuss.onlineM to Cyanide & Happiness@discuss.onlineEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square89linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTachyonTele@piefed.socialcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 day agoYes we got your point. Are you going to add anything or just repeat yourself?
minus-squareFedegenerate@fedinsfw.applinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·1 day agoI added a historical parallel “he/him” was claimed to be gender neutral. We’ve since learned. We can learn the lesson from the past and apply it forward, or not? So I did add something, but the point is true, I can merely repeat it and add context.
Yes we got your point. Are you going to add anything or just repeat yourself?
I added a historical parallel “he/him” was claimed to be gender neutral. We’ve since learned. We can learn the lesson from the past and apply it forward, or not?
So I did add something, but the point is true, I can merely repeat it and add context.