I saw this post and wanted to ask the opposite. What are some items that really aren’t worth paying the expensive version for? Preferably more extreme or unexpected examples.

    • Drusas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      Largely have to disagree with you there. The more expensive toys usually last a lot longer with my dogs.

      • IgnisAvem@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I agree, I’ve got a large dog and he can demolish cheap toys within hours but the good quality ones will last months

        • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          What I meant was not cheap toys as an alternative, but random crap like socks or a twig are usually more exciting for my golden retriever instead of some great toys which last a few mins of excitement and then he’s done

      • BlueFairyPainter@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Totally depends on the pet then. My cat is not a good predator, so breakage is not a problem, but she’s very picky with what she wants to play with and most new toys can’t keep her interest for longer than 2 weeks, so it’s absolutely a waste of money to spend more. The only toy that she consistently plays with is still a random piece of rope 😅

        So the pet’s personality plays a part, but seeing the other comments, I also see a cat vs dog difference.

      • prongs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Plus rabbits love cardboard. Toilet rolls and plain boxes get your surprisingly far with two rabbits! The only toys I’ll buy are the edible ones - willow tunnels for example. Watching them play with something you make is part of the joy.