Imagine this scenario:

  • All companies start producing mostly using only AI and firing people, because people have no use anymore
  • Joe spend most of his income on digital video games products
  • Joe get fired because he got replaced by AI now, since AIs are taking over most jobs
  • Joe has no income anymore
  • Joe doesn’t have any more money to spend on video games
  • Companies have no more profit, because people don’t have income, so people can’t spend on their AI produced products

In this scenario both lose, the company adopting AI and the worker. Am I missing something? Is there any possibility besides Universal Basic Income to keep the system running and not collapsing?

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 天前

    In the end, the owners have access to the resources, can get labor or whatever for cheap, and can live in control and luxury even without selling much or anything, while trading amongst themselves.

    They don’t have a need or use to produce for the parents anymore. It only makes sense for as long as they have gain.

    Owners may incite conflict and war to gain more control. The peasants will join for a lack of better knowledge, access, or alternatives.

    We’re back in the middle ages.


    People rise up and destroy or regulate the destructive forces, and establish a more sustainable system - maybe.