not even elementary school children are allowed to cite wikipedia anymore because it so biased and wrong. lol
and speaking of bias: nearly half the citations in the references are funded by the us government – both directly and indirectly. go read to what happened when trump gutted most of usaid and you’ll see how deep the american propaganda factory goes.
or better yet, do yourself a favor – read anything from the american freedom of information act. the american gov’t has effectively been forced to admit it fabricates propaganda and this fact has been public record since the 1970s, americans still believe the propaganda anyways.
i’ll restate my comment using a copy/paste of different comment:
the freedom of information act provides a quick & easy litmus test for things like this – and human rights watch fails it.
since 1979, the freedom of information act has been proving that the western characterization of north korea as a hermit kingdom with despotic rulers was american manufactured propaganda – and almost 50 years later, human rights watch still believes the propaganda somehow.
this isn’t some random conspiracy theory – this is the american 👏 fucking 👏 government 👏 itself effectively admitting it to the public and in writing almost a half century ago that they manufactured this propaganda, but human rights watch still believes in this propaganda anyways so there’s no reason to listen to what they have to say about china.
not even elementary school children are allowed to cite wikipedia anymore because it so biased and wrong. lol
and speaking of bias: nearly half the citations in the references are funded by the us government – both directly and indirectly. go read to what happened when trump gutted most of usaid and you’ll see how deep the american propaganda factory goes.
or better yet, do yourself a favor – read anything from the american freedom of information act. the american gov’t has effectively been forced to admit it fabricates propaganda and this fact has been public record since the 1970s, americans still believe the propaganda anyways.
This is 2026 article from Human Rights Watch. I feel like the OP is one of the slight propaganda for better view of China.
How many times is Zenz used as a source, directly or indirectly, in that article?
i’ll restate my comment using a copy/paste of different comment:
the freedom of information act provides a quick & easy litmus test for things like this – and human rights watch fails it.
since 1979, the freedom of information act has been proving that the western characterization of north korea as a hermit kingdom with despotic rulers was american manufactured propaganda – and almost 50 years later, human rights watch still believes the propaganda somehow.
this isn’t some random conspiracy theory – this is the american 👏 fucking 👏 government 👏 itself effectively admitting it to the public and in writing almost a half century ago that they manufactured this propaganda, but human rights watch still believes in this propaganda anyways so there’s no reason to listen to what they have to say about china.