Given that the bottom left is not even a cartoon but a photomanipulation I don’t think you’ve looked at them carefully enough that anyone should take your word for it.
I was saying they all look racist but you come in hostile so how bout you productively fuck off. Sorry my shitpost comment I made while I was on a walk about how some images are racist and look like a racist guy’s comics didn’t meet your exhaustive observational standards. I sure will sit down and REALLY study a post’s images and my comment before make any more posting lest I offend your delicate sensibilities more.
Or most likely I’ll glance at your poop brown tag you’ve earned now and extensively think “lul that guy’s a full on dingus from reddit”
Do you even know who A. Wyatt Man is? It’s an internet comment not a fucking research paper. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, stay ignorant, I’m not here to hold the hand of some fired up toxic asshole. If someone asked half-respectfully, I could elaborate.
Yeah he made some very widely spread racist pen and ink cartoons, including the extremely widespread “happy merchant” one featuring a Jewish man with hooked nose, curly hair and beard, kippah and fat lips.
His cartoons look absolutely nothing like the bottom two pictures. I know you don’t like that I’m persisting with this, but given that you could have said something like “yeah, the resemblance is really only with the top two” at any point, that’s on you.
Maybe you expected me to just not contradict you because you’re partially right? Tough titties, you were partially wrong, and getting the facts right on this is important. “Not a fucking research paper”? Take some pride in what you write, instead of giving in to the post truth era. Incorrect accusations of racism are harmful.
Given that the bottom left is not even a cartoon but a photomanipulation I don’t think you’ve looked at them carefully enough that anyone should take your word for it.
You’re right looking at pictures requires an extensive investigative study it can’t be just done at a glance.
No, extensive is not necessary, obviously. But it looks like a glance is not sufficient.
If you disagree you can say what’s wrong with the others. It’s a lot more productive than just talking vaguely.
I was saying they all look racist but you come in hostile so how bout you productively fuck off. Sorry my shitpost comment I made while I was on a walk about how some images are racist and look like a racist guy’s comics didn’t meet your exhaustive observational standards. I sure will sit down and REALLY study a post’s images and my comment before make any more posting lest I offend your delicate sensibilities more.
Or most likely I’ll glance at your poop brown tag you’ve earned now and extensively think “lul that guy’s a full on dingus from reddit”
But are still not saying how.
Oh no, however will I cope? The approval of people who add nothing to discussions was all that was keeping me going :'(
Do you even know who A. Wyatt Man is? It’s an internet comment not a fucking research paper. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, stay ignorant, I’m not here to hold the hand of some fired up toxic asshole. If someone asked half-respectfully, I could elaborate.
Yeah he made some very widely spread racist pen and ink cartoons, including the extremely widespread “happy merchant” one featuring a Jewish man with hooked nose, curly hair and beard, kippah and fat lips.
His cartoons look absolutely nothing like the bottom two pictures. I know you don’t like that I’m persisting with this, but given that you could have said something like “yeah, the resemblance is really only with the top two” at any point, that’s on you.
Maybe you expected me to just not contradict you because you’re partially right? Tough titties, you were partially wrong, and getting the facts right on this is important. “Not a fucking research paper”? Take some pride in what you write, instead of giving in to the post truth era. Incorrect accusations of racism are harmful.
deleted by creator