(TikTok screenshot)
HELP, I’VE BEEN CREAMPIED AND CAN’T GET UP!
happens to the best of us
I’ve certainly seen enough video evidence to support this theory
Auntie network :)
Does that make me an honorary male auntie when I deliver plan b?
I’d say so :)
As a society we need to make uncle a positive word again
Can someone translate, please? :)
This post was made by a delivery driver who was assigned to pick up Plan-B, an emergency birth control medication, and because these assignments can be rejected based on the contents before acceptance, the OP is expressing solidarity and support to someone they probably won’t meet.
Not sure which part you were confused about, so I just did the whole thing :P
Thank you. I thought PlanB was a rapper or something. This makes more sense now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_B_(musician)
You were right too. I quite liked his first two albums.
You can order rappers on DoorDash??? Man, we really do live in the future
The phrase “Plan B” was a phrase whose meaning a reasonably quick internet search did not reveal.
It’s called “Plan B” because it’s the back-up plan or contingency plan for when birth control methods otherwise fail.
it’s also called plan b because you have to obfuscate its use from fundamentalists
Worst-period-ever-causer-deluxe would work too.
BABYKILLER9000 /s
zygon’t
“Shm-o-smortion”
plan b is a pill people take after (unprotected) sex to avoid a pregnancy.
I just want to clarify, that it’s also commonly used for sex where protection was comprimised. (Broken condoms, forgotten birth control doses. Etc)
Saying it’s only for unprotected sex can give a stigma that it’s only used by irresponsible people. It can be, but it’s also a backup plan when your previous planning didn’t work, you know……a plan B.
That’s been my lived experience — literally a backup after the first firewall failed in some way.
I’d argue sex with compromised protection is unprotected ;)
but yeah, taking plan b does not mean you are irresponsible, it’s pretty much the opposite.
/j
So there’s this thing called MFA, that I’m sure we all know about, because when a woman really loves a man, she will look at her partners sticky notes and upgrade them to windows 11.
installing windows 11 is the opposite of love!
So, if a woman cannot use birth control pills nor have a temporary sterilization, and therefore the only usable contraceptive is a condom, her sex life is always unprotected?
Condoms can break if there is a long hair in a spot where it manages to cut the condom’s head off. You can learn to check for that, but many people learn that through, well, trial and error.
Whaaaaat?
Seriously. If you wear a working condom, it’s protected. If you then find out it broke, you learn it actually turned into unprotected sex somewhere in the process.
This isn’t rocket science.
It isn’t rocket science, but it sometimes the condom having broken gets noticed only when the woman feels something liquid-ish inside her that should not be there. I wouldn’t stigmatize inexperienced people as having had unprotected sex if they have done all they can with the knowledge they have to protect themselves.
But that IS unprotected. Not anyone’s fault, but still.
I do see the point about stigmatization
Condoms can break if there is a long hair in a spot where it manages to cut the condom’s head off. You can learn to check for that, but many people learn that through, well, trial and error.
since condoms are pretty much the best way to protect against all kinds of stds for sex that includes penises, people should learn to use them probably regardless of other forms of birth control they might or might not use.
but overall: if you have unprotected sex, you have unprotected sex, yes.
And also, if you have protected wex, you have protected sex, yes.
One interesting question: how do you know you have learned everything you need to know about condomology? If I understand right, you consider protected sex unprotected, if the people having it are not aware of some safety aspect regarding how to use a condom.
You seem to find it important to stigmatise people for having unprotected sex even in situations where they, by their own understanding, are having protected sex. I’d like you to elaborate a bit more on your philosophy, please! :)
You seem to find it important to stigmatise people for having unprotected sex even
no, that’s you projecting, i never implied having unprotected sex is a bad thing and don’t have a desire to drive figurative nails into anyones hands or feets.
and overall my philosophy regarding safe sex is simple:
if you don’t want kids, use any form of birth control that works for the people involved and if you are not sure about yourself or anyother people involved carrying an std use condoms, regardless of other forms of birth control.
You seem to find it important to stigmatise people for having unprotected sex even in situations where they, by their own understanding, are having protected sex. I’d like you to elaborate a bit more on your philosophy, please! :)
I’m sorry where did they stigmatize people for any sort of sex here?
You can accidentally have unprotected sex by using a condom improperly or using a damaged condom. That’s just a fact with no judgement attached to it. If, after the act, you find out that the condom failed for some reason or if you made the decision to have unprotected sex (again zero judgement, I’m not your dad) plan B is not an irresponsible option for contraception. No stigma
Yeah, everyone knows the goto for regular umprotected sex is regular abortions, or so the Conservatives say.
First time ever the driver tips the customer
I thought you could not see what the client is purchasing until you accept ?
I used to dash, for grocery orders you can see what the client is ordering before you pick it up. Helps you filter out the bs orders making you get like 20 non related items all across a grocery store wasting at least 30 minutes for $6.25
This could be a work of fiction by someone who has never doordashed before. I heard people do lie on the Internet.
This absolutely could have been posted after accepting the order tho.
Yeah, but the post states she accepted it quickly because the order contained plan B. This is just another fictional work for fake Internet points.
Sarcastically how did we ever survive before doordash? People had to actually leave their homes and go to the store themselves? I’m seriously curious how many housebound bed-ridden people were suffering before doordash existed. Or did the existence of doordash create a whole new population of people too lazy to run their own damn errands?
I can see it being a safety issue in this case. If a woman is in an abusive relationship, having the charge show up as “Door Dash” on their credit card statement could be a lot safer than a charge from a pharmacy.
I’ve also used Door Dash to buy things for my friends who live several states away. Or using Door dash to get things when you’re sick and don’t want to leave the house and get other people sick is reasonable. There are quite a few non-lazy reasons for using Door Dash (but it is a certain amount of laziness most of the time).
I’ve never used Doordash or any other delivery service (local pizza place that offers delivery aside), so I suppose the same exact way I live now? The few people I know personally who don’t have the ability to do their own shopping have relatives who shop for them, since family is free.
When I used to work at a grocery store out of high school, back before there were services people could use to do their shopping for them, I recall a few elderly regulars who would be driven to the store by their local community transport once a week or so, and they’d just hand one of us their shopping list. They’d pay, we’d load their groceries into the transport van, and they’d get driven home where presumably the driver would help them unload.
On the one hand, seems unnecessary to force someone out of the home to get driven to a store where someone else does their shopping for them anyways, but that was back when paying by cash or check was the norm (hard to trust a stranger with a large amount of cash or a blank check). Delivery services simplify that at least, but I’m hoping they don’t have to pay more for that today than they used to, since we at least used to do the shopping part for them for free (not sure how much they were paying for the transport though).
seems unnecessary to force someone out of the home to get driven to a store
This can actually be a good thing though. Getting out of your home and being able to take part in society “normally” (even if it’s just getting your ass in the grocery store) can improve health greatly. If you’re just forced to stay at home many people go bonkers and/or their functionality drops, so elderly people for example being still able to do shopping might be very important for keeping them going
for bed ridden people, they had caretakers.
but I’m willing to bet doordash made people even more sedentary creative more people dependent on it
