Edit: As @bdonvr@thelemmy.club points out below

  1. This is just a mascot and is not a new logo
  2. The blog referencing Mozilla’s statement on the mascots gender says, (he/she/they/them/it), use whatever pronoun you prefer.
  • errer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Feels like a publicity stunt more than a genuine attempt to include non-binary people.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        they do though via stating its pronouns - even including it, repeatedly referring to it even in their intro blog post as “they”

        but that’s because it’s a feature to increase the feeling friendliness of the browser by establishing personal connection via the application of any (or non-) gender by the user no matter their preference rather than intended as a portrayal of a sentient character having made a decision for themselves

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            that’s exactly it: in context, kit is a feature intended to be interpreted by the user; not a representation of a sentient character having made a conscious choice to be non-binary simply because of mozilla’s chosen pronouns and lack of gender expression

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Exactly this. It feels like some kind of nonsense spam or troll.

      If I was to take the bait, I might say it was to cover for their CEO making some anti gay marriage political contribution. But that was like 15 years ago, I don’t even know if he’s still CEO or if anyone even remembers.