Every single candidate who could have won was pro-Israel. That’s the default position of the US government regardless of which party’s in power. It’s NOT the default position to randomly genocide, say, Iran, though. It is BS that you have to vote for more genocide support or less genocide support? Yes. But voting for more genocide support or not voting at all so the ones that support more genocide win worked out really well, huh?
So you’re saying the default position was to lose the election. She made the conscious decision to not want to win. All I’m hearing. There’s a pathway to win she chose to do the opposite.
Every single candidate who could have won was pro-Israel. That’s the default position of the US government regardless of which party’s in power. It’s NOT the default position to randomly genocide, say, Iran, though. It is BS that you have to vote for more genocide support or less genocide support? Yes. But voting for more genocide support or not voting at all so the ones that support more genocide win worked out really well, huh?
If Israel wants it, then it is the default position. If you don’t think Harris would have bombed Iran, then I have a bridge to sell you
So you’re saying the default position was to lose the election. She made the conscious decision to not want to win. All I’m hearing. There’s a pathway to win she chose to do the opposite.
You realize that presidential candidates also have to take international relations into account, right?
So breaking from Israel to win an election may not play out great with Israel after being elected. That goes for any of our allies.
But hey, we got a felon rapist pedophile that lets Israel tell him to do whatever they want him to do. So I guess that worked out for us, right?
deleted by creator