I posted this meme to the Lemmy Shitpost community. I reckoned that it might generate a bit of debate, and would probably end up locked, but the entire post got deleted, and moreover, I’m now forbidden from sharing political posts to the community. Political posts are not against the rules of the community.

I have reason to believe that the post was deleted not because it was controversial, but because the moderator (Decoy321) disagreed with the political slant of the meme. The reason I find this suspicious is because other controversial posts, such as one about veganism remains up, and Decoy321 seemed to enjoy the fact it was controversial:

  • Universal Monk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    PTB!

    Bruh, I criticized the two-party system, and admitted I voted third party (Socialist Party) in the 2024 presidential election. Lemmy is STILL pissed off about it and says I’m a Trumper–all because I didn’t Democrat. More and more people are starting to realize a 2-party system sucks, but damn, Lemmy ain’t their yet.

    You marked for life now, dawg! Good luck! LMAO

    (Oh and fuck you Lemmy, I’m gonna vote third party in the next election too. :) )

    • calmblue75@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I am not able to comprehend people criticizing voting for third party. What is the meaning of vote if you cannot select a candidate of your choice?

      • Universal Monk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Exactly my thoughts! It’s finally becoming more common to think like this on Lemmy now, but holy hell… in 2024 many Lemmy’s legit wanted to crucify people who thought like this. And they still follow me around and regularly ask that I be banned from the entire fediverse!

        I’m not going anywhere tho. :) And I’m so proud of how mad they got, I put their comments and posts in my profile banner:

    • bearboiblake@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Yeah I’ve been fending off those freaks like they’re extras running at me one at a time in a kung-fu movie with bad takes. I’m not even American, I wasn’t eligible to vote in the 2024 election, but because I criticized Joe Biden/Kamala Harris, that must mean I just fuckin LOVE Trump.

  • Godric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This meme below got removed a few days ago. I think if you post anything controversial that rustles enough jimmies to make people rage-cry report you, they just remove the post rather than deal with angry nerds.

    Or they just really hate trains, the jerks!

    Edit: Same mod

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I disagree with your meme, especially during primary season, but I still upvoted because I think everyone should be able to post their “controversial” memes.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ll be honest. Even as an anarcho-communist, I don’t care for these kinds of political reductions.

    However, given that it’s a shitposting community, seems like lost-nuance is kind of part and parcel to the spirit of the community (which is why I don’t go there). I’d call this PTB.

  • Wren@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    How dare you shitpost in the shitposting community. Your post is exactly the kind of thing I like to see there.

    I agree, the mod probably didn’t like the political message.

    • bearboiblake@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I had a quick look through and pretty much every moderator on that community has almost no activity recently, I wonder if they’re using their accounts for moderator action only, and participating on another account.

  • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Something something it’s more dignified to be killed by blue, just don’t post in .world, help grow other servers

    • bearboiblake@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Someone has to get dirty rolling around in the trenches with the hogs, gotta burst their bubble occasionally. But yep, you’re right.

  • NotSteve_@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Nah I reported your post too. Stop spamming US internal political shit in the shitpost community. Keep that to a US politics community

    • bearboiblake@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thanks for sharing and being honest and I totally get it, but don’t you think that should be a rule that’s fairly and equally enforced, not just applied to posts that the mods personally disagree with?

      • NotSteve_@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah fair point, it definitely should be applied equally and its not right if its only subject to mods’ opinions. I really wish the community would ban political posts entirelyi need some reprieve from the doom

        • Wren@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          The problem with banning politics is determining what’s considered political. Not long ago divorce, adoption, abortion, nazis, and women wearing pants were hot topics. Now it’s immigration, abortion and nazis again, and queer folks wearing skirts.

          I’d rather endure some of that doom and gloom through a shipost than the rapid onslaught of panic-inducing headlines.

          • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Old-school internet forums usually did that. Not sure about all the nuance and specifics to meme groups… Just saying it’s not a generally impossible thing, or a new idea.

            • Wren@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              24 hours ago

              Not saying it hasn’t been done, I’m saying it’s hard to do well. I’ve seen “women’s issues” and “pronouns” included under “politics,” in old-school and new forums, which is why I’m hesitant to agree with no-politics rules.

              • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 hours ago

                Sure. I’d consider them politics as well. Those are all topics with a very high chance someone comes along with some (weird) opinion and makes the discussion derail. And then everyone stops discussing the scifi computer game or Linux, and homes in on the controversial topic with a lot of feelings involved.

                I think the big cultural achievement is: Forum members have all agreed to live a certain culture. They do it together and there’s some group cohesion and a pre-made agreement to all pull in the same direction. So what I’ve seen a lot of work isn’t done by the mods, but people all identify with the rules and the next random person will step in and state “it’s getting political again”, and then everybody else is cautious not to add to the drama.

                I think we lost that with social media. And there’s also less group cohesion here. So we end up handling it out of band, mods have to delete posts. Plus we regularly have to peck out the rules again and again… I mean it’s not as bad as my words make it out to be. And this isn’t entirely down to design and hierarchy. But also group dynamics changed, there’s more regular people online than some 15 years ago instead of nerds amongst themselves. And I think politics became way more polarized.

                Ultimately, it’s all part of our lives. There’s obviously demand to discuss politics, pronouns, the crazy setup US Americans call a political system… And I think they’re all valid topics. We just have to figure out a way to make it work. Which isn’t easy. But I think the Fediverse is up to something. Our basic idea allows us to customize the experience, steer clear of some things or dive down… I think we just have to strike some balance and put in some more work because politics is such an all-consuming topic. And we’re a bit of a diverse crowd here. Which is a good thing. But also makes certain things more difficult.

                • Wren@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  The person who comes along with their disruptive opinions should be moderated, not people who simply exist. Being a woman or having chosen pronouns isn’t dramatic.

                  If someone is uncomfortable with a topic they can simply disengage and start their own thread on their chosen subject.

                  It’s either accept that no one agrees on what’s considered political, or have firm rules about subjects that can and can’t be discussed.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    No shit show in the community with “shit” in the name!!1!

    […] because […] disagreed with the political slant

    no shit.

    But that’s kinda the thing with discussing politics online… Usually ends with some flame war.

    • bearboiblake@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The thing is, it wasn’t even that bad. People were disagreeing, but for the most part, it wasn’t too bad from what I saw. Only one comment was deleted for incivility prior to the entire thread getting nuked.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I 100% agree with the mod comment. Seems to me this has to be considered top tier shit as well.