I don’t agree with her methods and I don’t believe it’s the correct way to get the point across.

Just keep in mind - one side is crying its heart out due to unbelievable cruelty while another side is simply annoyed that someone says something about requesting them to acknowledge the suffering they are causing simply because they want to eat what they want to eat whatever the cost may be because they believe they are entitled for it for some reason unknown to me.

The vast majority of them requires meat at much lower quantities in order to be healthy(saying lower so you won’t attack me for saying not at all) but they still choose to consume for many other very selfish reasons.

Of course… What airline companies are most concerned about is the well being of their luggage handlers.

Even if they claim that this is one of the reasons, it’s a by product of cost management.

How is that logical that the man should pay extra cause he’s bigger/taller but small people should get extra luggage bonus?

Not even taking into account that this very short lady will be far more comfortable during the flight than the gentleman.

I stand corrected. So sorry to hear that and for your loss. I’ll be more thoughtful in the future

Saying ‘no questions asked’ is weird saying in most situations.

Honestly if anyone I’m in good terms with came to me and was like 'can I have 10$? ’ I would just give it to them and resume my things cause I probably don’t even want to know or care what they’ll do with it.

I mean, whats the worst you could do with 10$

Never understood that phrasing. A spare? As in a cigarette I carry but don’t need/don’t plan to use? And borrow? As in youre going to take it and bring it back to me later?

I know I’m being too literal but damn it so stupid

Edit thanks for the good chuckle btw

I hear you, you said it perfect. No doubt raw dogging is tough as tits, but keep in mind that the first week is way harder than the rest.

The thing is that while not getting you high, at the same time it makes stuff harder to deal with. I didn’t realize how tired it made me to smoke all day long. Had an afternoon nap daily. Now I don’t need it.

Plus, I get to use much better product since I use way less.

Most important, don’t be too hard on yourself. Took me a few tries as well. Just medidate on it for a while. i’m sending positive vibes and good thoughts your way, you got this 🤙

What worked for me is doing a tolerance break of 3 weeks. Eventually it also helped me stop smoking(now I just vape oil).

But the point is that after the t break I remembered again what it feels like to be stoned and in amazing headspace, and from that point I only use it when I can totally commit to it.

No use fighting these egotistical assholes; they love making their kids the problem of other people. So that they won’t have to suffer in regret alone.

Dooz nuts

They are all unethical tho

My dude it already happened

Howdy?

Really nice idea in principle but will certainly be exploited by richer ppl

And then some

It was funny chill

Honestly, OOP should’ve broadcast that fact. It is a lot easier sell than letting people think they changed the code somehow.

Not sure why they are trying to show it as a seperate project.

I very much agree with your conclusions and general approach.

LLMs are great for certain tasks that are programming related and it does it very well. I, too, often find myself needing scripts that as long as they did what they were suppose to, I really didn’t care how.

Another thing I’ve noticed(which is probably related to amounts of training data) is that it can help better with simple Python tasks as opposed to how it handles simple rust tasks.

But you mentioned one of my main issues with. Ice been programming for 15 years or so, and still learning. All the available llms did crucial errors about fundamental tabd complex topics and got the answer so very wrong but also sounding very convincing. Couple it with lack of proper linking to the sources of the response, you might see why having it explain code might cause your learn wrongly. Although it is also possible to say this about randoms internet tutorials. I always try to remind myself that it’s a tool that produces output that always needs to be verified.

I only found it useful doing trivial chores such as converting between data structures, maybe create a test for a function, parsing and some regex. Anything deeper than that was full of errors or the it offered was suboptimal at best. It also fails a lot of times in fetching the relevant docs/sources for the discussion. I gave up trying after so many times it basically told me " go search for yourself"

The real question in my opinion is how does a pro truly benefit from it other than being a different type of a search engine