Yes you do. You know you want it.

Toast bread with a bit of ketchup and a slice of cheese on top, sprinkle a bit of salt if necessary, then bake until the cheese bubbles. I call it the poor man’s pizza.

That’s an intelligent analysis of yourself, a supporting evidence that you fit in the nerd category.

Krasnov the agent orange

And the president of Indonesia goes: “oil palms are trees, they’ve got leaves”

Yes.

Relocated to another position, a lateral movement perhaps.

Pope: dies

Corpo God : "We are happy to announce the relocation of Pope Francis to his next steps within the company. We are thankful for their contribution for the last 12 years and we look forward to their future achievements. BR, management.

You might be an inspiration for my weekend

Now I want to make some gnocchi…

Glad he helped you out and I wish you the best!

Why does he write the letter H like an M?? Who writes like that…

Why would Taiwan reconcile with China, dude?

This is me with all black clothes and a pair of white shoes 😂

I felt that everything was too colorful and incoherent, picking black clothes is simple and doesn’t take any mental energy.

This is great, mind if I borrow it? 😂

“We are currently clean on OPSEC” 🤡

Not scrambled then?

I understand your point. It’s just easy to make it economic as an example, productivity can go to hell. Life satisfaction and life expectancy by themselves should be a big enough motivation to support public welfare. It’s just that the arguments against are usually rooted in economic motivations, e.g. inefficiency of the tax money management.

There could be a misunderstanding here, I meant public welfare spending, not personal spending.

Countries who spend more on public welfare would get more people being productive rather than staying home sick. Higher life expectancy and higher life satisfaction is also expected.

The welfare spending provides an oversized return in productivity. What is common to all the low spenders - low life expectancy.