AOSP is the most secure base. GrapheneOS focus is to be the most secure OS. Not to be the best open source mobile OS or even to be FLOSS.
Notice how they’re complaining only about things that could improve security, not general usablity fixes.
What is the software on this thing? If it isn’t open source, it’s DOA (not because I think so, but because the number of potential consumers would be incredibly small)
Search for “EU digital wallet”
Nah. It’s funnier this way
Something, something, one mouse per 2 square centimeters
I run an AI Agent as root and let it manage everything
What exactly?
What better way than price of services sold do you have to measure generated value?
So you recognize stalking is bad… AND LET YOUR CITIZENS DO IT???
I don’t like them, but I think progress is more important.
Fdroid can be a security hole. They might not awarded security bounty for some reason. Those 2 things are not connected
Wtf is galaxy quantum, why does this “quantum” phone has no quantum element, what was it used for in the first place and why is samsung even selling this phone if A57 exists (presumably in sk too)?
So many questions
“They”? Consumers want that
What one has to do with another?
You can’t just call things fake.
Money is the best thing to measure value.
Notice how I’m not even including emissions reduced by Google claiming parts of the market (so, for example, if Bing had 20% of search engine market share and generated 2X pollution, while Google had 80% and generated 8X pollution, Google taking over the whole market wouldn’t change total pollution output, because total pollution stays at 10X).
I’d propose the opposite: 20 years in prison for anyone who opposes AI research.
Maybe not really 20 years, but small cut of profits (percentage!) to fund AI developement
Envinronment.
Google is now able to generate 43% more value to the society (revenue) per unit of pollution. Their profits rose by 93% (market cap by 66%) adjusted to pollution.
I’m not the LLM
I’ve already done my research, thanks.
Android or AOSP?