My client renders this as ( c )

This can also be used a great example of proof by contradiction: There is no correct answer in the options. Proof: Assume there was a correct answer in the options. Then it must be either 25%, 50% or 60%. Now we make a case distinction.

(A) Assume it was 25. Then there would be two of four correct options yielding in a probability of 50%. Therefore 50 must be the correct answer. -> contradiction.

(B) Assume it was 50. Then there would be one of four correct options yielding in a probability of 25%. Therefore the answer is 25. -> contradiction.

© Assume it was 60%. Since only 0,1,2,3 or 4 of the answers can be correct the probability of choosing the right answer must be one of 0% 25% 50% 75% or 100%. -> contradiction.

Because of (A), (B) and ©, it cannot be 25, 50% or 60%. -> contradiction.

One. University, organizing my life and work.

I mean conceptually, not physically like between a park area and a road.

I think there is a difference between air quality (pollution) and co2 levels.

Like I always think that people don’t get one thing about trees in a city. There purpose is is not about co2. The co2 reduction of city trees is neglectable. The reason you need them in a city is temperature regulation, shade, air quality, mood, the local eco system and maybe solidifying unsealed ground. Putting these tanks in a city is laughably inefficient w.r.t. co2 conversion if you compare this to any effort to do this in instustrial capacity ( which is is also still laughably inefficient)

The perfect loop doesn’t exis….

What is extroverted introverted?

I would advise against those clean code books. There is no such thing as „clean code“. How you code always depends on what u want achieve, how much effort u can / want to put into, the skills of u and your collaborators, and generally experience.

Es geht doch nicht um die Republikaner, ich meinte damit den „breiten Teil“ der Bevölkerung.

Beispiel: Letztes Jahr während der Brandmauer Demos habe ich Leute gesehen, die sich auf die Demo mit Antifa Fahne und einem Banner gestellt haben auf dem so etwas stand wie „Wir haben es ja schon immer gesagt“. Ich fand es nicht besonders sinnvoll, Leuten die normalerweise eher nicht auf solche Demos gehen, dann aber da waren vor den Kopf zu stoßen.

Yeah… Exposing your autistic sons „strangeness“ to the internet sure seems healthy for that kid…

Ein weiteres Exemplar des absolut nicht hilfreichen Narrativs von „Ich hab’s euch doch schon immer gesagt“. Ich denke es hilft nicht besonders sich hochnäsig gegenüber denjenigen zu verhalten, mit denen man gemeinsam etwas erreichen möchte.

So schlecht ist Sachsen jetzt auch nicht

man hes gone have to do a lot of walking again… Offtopic: The funny thing is TREE(3) is an absurdly long distance, independent of the physical unit. Even TREE(3) times the planck length is unimaginable long, as the ratio between a meter and the planck length is absolutely neglectable against such super large numbers.

This was originally some anti GMO certitifate

Ich glaube es liegt an dir

I was worried, that they could get very expensive when those tarifs apply.

Are you?

Linus Neuman (zu dem Zeitpunkt Sprecher des Ccc) saß mal in einem Beratungsausschauss des Bundestages und erklärte warum $Sache nicht sinnvoll sei. Ein Abgeordneter des Gremiums, der im Gremium, für $Sache war, kam danach zu L.N. und sagte ihm: „Ich weiß sie habe Recht, aber so ist das nun mal“…

Das von der webseite https://www.ccc.de/