No, my argument is that you got your facts wrong about what happened here and for what purpose.

If you read my comments again, you’ll note I didn’t dispute or argue any notions on how green nuclear energy really is.

From the article:

The measure is an environmental protection requirement to avoid discharging too much hot water into rivers already warming from the heatwave. Power plants critical to the country’s electricity production use river water to cool their reactors, which heats the water that is then released back into the river.

You missed the “too much” and “already warming” parts of this paragraph. I’d rather not know anything about nuclear power than pretend like I do and then get mad when my baseless assumptions get checked.

But go on, tell me more how you care about green energy but not about heating rivers up to high degrees. Or just be honest and say you’re just here to shit on nuclear energy no matter what, and you don’t actually care about ecological impacts.

The reason they did this was to not harm the environment by dumping a ton of hot water into the local rivers.

If they thought they had a good chance of losing that much money, they wouldn’t have made the movie. The news here is more about how their risk calculations were off.

If they were looking at things collectively this way, they wouldn’t be making so many remakes and would be making more original movies.

This movie is the result of the risk analysis of each project, not the risk over a time period with multiple projects.

That’s what the stupid, stupid Texan Latinos said, yes.

If that was really your concern, why did it start with you saying international sports competitions shouldn’t ban any countries?

Oh so suddenly you found the means of determining what actions disqualify a country now?

What does that have to do with you not knowing that when countries get banned from international competitions, it’s easy to find out exactly why, and that having such policies is pretty simple?

What do you mean “Yeah…”? They already replied to you a while ago and it wasn’t anything at all like this whining above.

Go respond to the legitimate misgivings about your source instead of pretending like this guy’s stupid prediction came true.

The only people sending this message are morons who think the NP is a reputable source of news and not conservative agiprop.

Texas Hispanics are stupid, stupid people.

Don’t pretend like you’d read such a list. You just said you had no way to figure out why a country would be banned from an international competition just one comment ago. If you couldn’t even think of reading an official explanation, we’re supposed to believe that a list that would be published in the same place would result in you being better informed?

It’s pretty dead simple to ban a country from competition for being warmongering and genocidal. What would be complicated?

There’s no means of determining what actions disqualify a country?

You really think Russia was banned from IOC participation for no clear reason and that it wasn’t explained at all? There are some very simple means you can employ to determine what actions disqualified them.

deleted by creator

They started adding ads all over that Google news feed when you swipe right from your homescreen last year, the one that’s built into the Pixel launcher.

Australian wines are pretty popular in Canada.

That’s California’s problem with the rest of their own country and their POTUS, not Canada’s problem.

What is your point? That Canada should accept Californian wines to stick it to Trump?

You didn’t even open the link to realize it’s not an article huh