So, what happens when the judge orders something that can’t be done? Like, if this guy is dead already, or El Salvador won’t release him, what then? What is supreme, the judge or the situation?

Is that seriously the most important thing you are concerned about?

That’s why it’s bad policy to think about transit in terms of making a profit. It’s a public service, that’s the profit, and we all get it.

Didn’t they just lose one, for several days, within the continental US?

Wow, it even says, in this very article, that this is all a lie, but they know people won’t read that far.

It won’t be that price for a new tenant. This is special just for them.

I’d prefer a world where he learned a trade, and spent his life building affordable housing and never considered teaching anyone anything.

This is what happens when you have a large segment of the population that is both opposed to something, and not terribly against acting in bad faith. You get poison pills in your regulations.

Isn’t this a little bit like a shit flavoured candy maker, suing Walmart to force them to sell their shit flavoured candy? What grounds do they have to force Facebook to have anything to do with them?

How exactly did our democracy manage, between 1867 and whenever the fuck Facebook came by?

Not that weird. The kids are the priority, and they should be.

If I were a supplier, that might sound like a feature, not a bug.

idk if I want an entire instance made up of CBC commenters.

If it’s legally binding, maybe Google ought to remove it from the auto-send row? I mean, it was a joke that somebody would trip and fall and their pen would just accidentally sign their name, but that could actually happen with this!