

I attended PIELC (Public Interest Environmental Law Conference) many years ago where a guest from China spoke about China’s trajectory towards reduced CO2 emissions. It’s interesting to see some elements of that work begin to bear fruit


I attended PIELC (Public Interest Environmental Law Conference) many years ago where a guest from China spoke about China’s trajectory towards reduced CO2 emissions. It’s interesting to see some elements of that work begin to bear fruit


I wonder if boycotting of big tech will be swept under the rug of AI fear…


Yeah, I heard it happened 30 minutes after some activity got dissolved. (I don’t have a source offhand for that.)
I deliberately chose to quote the words of the perpetrator, and the UN as a recognized observer, because the perpetrator incriminates themselves


“The Israeli forces are saying that they might have hit Aysenur unintentionally - that she was not a target” … “but aimed at the key instigator of the riot”. The UN says Aysenur was “shot in the head” because the perpetrators said protestors “burned tyres and hurled rocks towards security forces”
Engagement is what matters, and that’s driven by habits. The protests were disruptive. The switching of apps is disruptive. I see this more as a way to distract and bring up engagement again.
Is it a good idea? Honestly, if they want to succeed I think they should focus on what has become broken with reddit first
And yet Tesla stock is about the same as it was before the Tesla Takedown boycotts started. Not that stocks are logical, but seeing impact in stocks would be nice retribution.