

I’m not going to get too into the politics of the troubles, but I think it’s kind of worth remembering that this did happen in the context of an armed conflict, morality gets fuzzy.
Thinking about it in the context of modern conflicts, let’s say a Palestinian or Lebanese group assassinated an influential Israeli businessman who was vocally advocating for Israel continuing their operations, or perhaps a Ukrainian group assassinated a Russian oligarch.
Or hell, the guys who shot the United healthcare CEO, or Charlie Kirk.
In some theoretical future where there’s some kind of peace treaty between Russia and Ukraine, Israel and Palestine/Lebanon, or the US has gone through some kind of civil war to overthrow MAGA types, would it seem so unreasonable to want those people to be freed as part of the negotiations?
Or looking further back, let’s say members of the French or Polish or whatever resistance in WWII had assassinated a German businessman who helped fund the Nazi war machine, wouldn’t we have expected them to be freed after the war?
And I think likely that’s the same kind of way at least some Irish people would likely view these guys in a similar light.
And of course, depending on what side of the conflict you were on, you may not see things that way. If you were a Nazi, or if you support Israel or Russia or Trump, you’d probably think of those assassins as nothing but criminals or terrorists, but as the saying goes, one man’s terrorist is another’s freedom-fighter


















There is a small chance that this is actually a true fact, but I’ve never been able to find any source that backs it up. I haven’t looked hard, but I have looked, and my google-fu is usually pretty good
I remember hearing once that “blue raspberry” flavor exists because when food scientists were trying to come up with a formula for artificial raspberry flavoring they just couldn’t get it quite right, they got pretty close, but not quite close enough for people to buy that it tastes like raspberries. But some marketing guru decided it was good enough and they’d just color it blue and people would accept it “of course it doesn’t taste like regular raspberries, this is blue raspberry, it’s different, it’s supposed to taste like that”
And yes, blue raspberries kind of actually exist. They probably used that as justification banking on the fact that most people don’t actually know what they taste like.
There’s also some stuff about a certain red dye being banned at one point, and marketing also wanting to differentiate raspberry because people already associated red with flavors like cherry, strawberry, watermelon, etc. and those are probably true as well, but I don’t think those reasons are incompatible with this explanation.