

And that’ll goad them into enacting marshall law, and well, they have tanks.
And that’ll goad them into enacting marshall law, and well, they have tanks.
Very old. I remember finding the “office startup accelerator”, or whatever it was called, that pre loaded all the office dlls in my startup items way back before 2000.
Sheetz is no longer all that cheap. Chicken tenders and a drink (no fries) are now close to $11. Still fast and tasty though.
The horse would also have snapped in half.
As always with these laws, they are a tool designed to be used selectively against someone you already decided you don’t like.
What consequences for breaking the laws that enforce rules like those have have been applied so far to this administration?
Quality of medical care being driven down, and its price being driven up, by insurance middlemen.
And not defining the abbreviations.
I’ve got prosaspoagnosia, I just want them to display little name tags under the faces of people that I know.
Typically that gets removed when doing other things.
The problem isn’t someone getting a pronoun wrong on occasion. It’s when someone deliberately uses the wrong one, and often times stresses the the pronunciation, in order to make sure you know they choose to use the wrong one deliberately.
OP says it was rejected for the message being “unfair” and “alarmist”, not for any quality reasons. You are entitled to your opinion, but it doesn’t have any bearing on why it was rejected.
You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how political cartoons work. It’s a format for making a statement, there is no requirement for it to “add something that words couldn’t”. But even in this case, it does. It adds a direct and visceral comparison between what Trump and his Republican cronies are doing to America and what was felt on 9/11.
It’s a pretty fucking simple concept, it doesn’t need to be “clever”.
They clearly should have used an ice cream scoop.
The owner also can’t park for shit either.
It’s weak to that too.
That’s just the monetary cost. They have have cost society far more than that.
Or even better, “even though you pay for the ad free subscription, this video is only available with ads”.
No way. They would rather burn it to drive up prices by increasing scarcity than set the precedent of lowering prices.