Ultimately, my argument is that the “paradox of tolerance” is intellectually dishonest answer to cognitive dissonance. It’s refusing to accept responsibility for selecting in-groups and out-groups.

It’s not prescriptive. These divisions are a natural conclusion of moral systems. Acting on these divisions is a natural conclusion of other moral systems.

Universal basic coca

Some people live their lives frothing at the mouth to telegraph how morally superior they are to everyone around them.

The message “black lives matter” was intentionally amplified to sow dissent along racial lines.

You both completely miss the argument. Cile is strawmanning, vas is again viewing from the omniscient or opposing viewpoint.

Virtually all intolerants perceive themselves as victims. Permitting “intolerance of intolerance” is just accelerationist, “might makes right” ideology.

Unironically yes? Replacement theory, blood libel, global elitism… Whatever the angle, lots of -isms expouse roots in victimhood.

Keep going, brother. Surely the right egg is out there for your seed. Or vice versa, idk.

Is 2025, men can get pregnant too.

Edit: accidentally double posted

That view is fine and dandy with an an omniscient lens of who’s the reactionary intolerant and who is the originator of intolerance.

Tests will also miss some pregnancies. Routinely asking and testing will have the fewest false negatives.

Unlimited PTO is psycho mind games shit.

“the American crisis” is a later series of pamphlets by paine.

Oh the poomanity!

✅ feces

✅ Transport parcel

I’m choosing to believe it was an intentional literary device to illustrate the feelings of anxiety and inexorability caused by the dream and their waking existence.

You should try picking up some

OMG… Thought this was a shop…

Lemmy be damned, but I usually just use lens in chrome.