• Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, not true. Go read Wikipedia for some reliable sources on the historical existence of Jesus of Nazareth.

      • CXORA@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you notice the comment you replied to explicitly said “first hand” and you explicitly said “reliable”.

        You are talking about different things.

        • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I said go there for some reliable sources.

          You want evidence of the historical Jesus, that article contains almost 300 references and about 40 external sources.

          The existence of Jesus of Nazareth is widely accepted. If you believe otherwise, you need to provide extraordinary evidence for your extraordinary claims.

        • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Obviously not, Herakles was named that as Zues’ hamfisted attempt to appease the wife he cheated on by naming his bastard after her