They occur in around 80% of Asians, and 80% to 85% of Native American infants. Approximately 90% of Polynesians and Micronesians are born with slate grey nevus, as are about 46% of children in Latin America, where they are associated with non-European descent. These spots also appear on 5–10% of babies of full Caucasian descent. African American babies have slate grey nevus at a frequencies of 90% to 96%.

  • rnercle@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    i’m guessing that you’re not writing about the article but the photo used in that Wikipedia article.

    what’s nsfw about a photo of a 6 months old baby, used to demonstrate the birthmark that’s the subject of the article?

    are even baby bums nsfw now?

    • Plum@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      NSFW it or I’ll nuke it. The community has spoken. Nudity is generally covered in things NSFW.

        • Plum@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Super cringe. I’ll take the hate, though, if it means I don’t have to look at an exposed ass unless I want to.

          • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not what you wrote originally though? Don’t write “the community has spoken” immediately followed by “I don’t care what you all do, I do what I like”. That’s kinda the opposite of what you postured as in the beginning.

            Or was that the royal We and you are the community?

            And that’s regardless of the fact that I agree that the photo falls under the original definition of NSFW.