Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to The Democratic National Convention™ of Libjerk@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 27 days agoFour Democrats Pass Bill Making It Harder for Married Women to Votenewrepublic.comexternal-linkmessage-square36linkfedilinkarrow-up141arrow-down17cross-posted to: politics@lemmy.worldusa@midwest.social
arrow-up134arrow-down1external-linkFour Democrats Pass Bill Making It Harder for Married Women to Votenewrepublic.comUnruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to The Democratic National Convention™ of Libjerk@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 27 days agomessage-square36linkfedilinkcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.worldusa@midwest.social
minus-squaresuperniceperson@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·26 days agoYou want to explain why the unconstitutional practice of a filibuster stops dems but does not stop republicans?
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·26 days agoThis dude is trippling down on the imaginary house filibuster…
minus-squaresuperniceperson@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·26 days agoThis dude is tripling down on the idea republicans don’t pass legislation far more frequently than dems despite never having a filibuster-proof Senate majority.
minus-squareBeetschnapps@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·26 days agoOkay that’s a valid point. But doesn’t disqualify the other point…
You want to explain why the unconstitutional practice of a filibuster stops dems but does not stop republicans?
This dude is trippling down on the imaginary house filibuster…
This dude is tripling down on the idea republicans don’t pass legislation far more frequently than dems despite never having a filibuster-proof Senate majority.
Okay that’s a valid point. But doesn’t disqualify the other point…