• [deleted]@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Unlike reviewing a human who writes code there is zero chance of AI learning from the past and making fewer mistakes in the future. At a least a human has a chance of becoming better at coding from review feedback.

    • CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Ergo, you should leave as little places for AI to make mistakes, undiagnosable by static analysis tools, as possible. In other words, make all the technical and algorithmic decisions yourself.

    • BJW@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      16 hours ago

      No? Are you not aware of the concept of “memories”? AI do indeed take feedback into account, if they’re designed to.

      • [deleted]@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        AI does not have memories.

        It has a comparatively small context window that makes things worse the more it fills up.

        • architect@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Eh I really think it does. You don’t news to load everything into context. You need to load where everything is located into context.

        • BJW@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          16 hours ago

          You are mistaken. Some AI models do indeed have memories.

          • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            15 hours ago

            They save some strings in a document to later read and “remember”. Calling them memories is a reach.

            • BJW@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              15 hours ago

              My point stands that they can learn from feedback. Your memories are only information in a virtual document, too. Just as susceptible to corruption, or misinterpretation.

              • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Does an Alzheimer’s patient learn things just because they read the same note every morning explaining the reality to them?

                • BJW@lemmus.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  Only because you don’t think of it as one. It’s just a different medium for the storage of information.

      • pageflight@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The auto-generated memories I’ve seen it create are pretty inane: “always name variables container_ when in MySpecificClass”. Not really learning engineering principles.

        Similar, I’ve found AGENT.md files might nudge it in the right direction, but as always it’s a fuzzy matcher, not a learning engineer.

        • BJW@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          It’s best to generate memories manually, but I’ve had good fortune with auto-generated so far. At least using Co-pilot.

          I have found it best to have another AI generate the agent.md - having a layer of interpretation can really clarify the information imparted.