inari@piefed.zip to Wikipedia@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoCentre Partymedia.piefed.zipimagemessage-square142linkfedilinkarrow-up1759arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up1751arrow-down1imageCentre Partymedia.piefed.zipinari@piefed.zip to Wikipedia@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square142linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBanMeFromPosting@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·16 hours agoFor that response to have made sense I would have had to say some dumb absolute statement about the validity of violence and nonviolence, but I didnt.
minus-squarelastlybutfirstly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·16 hours agoThen what I replied to was even more bizarre and cryptic than I gave it credit for. What the hell does it mean?
minus-squareBanMeFromPosting@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·12 hours agoNo, it follows pretty clearly from your statement.
minus-squarelastlybutfirstly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·8 hours agoYou’re being cute but I’m telling you, the FBI team monitoring your accounts across the Internet see straight through it. You’re encouraging people to forsake Gandhi’s non-violent methods and start getting violent.
minus-squareBanMeFromPosting@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 hours agoQuote where I made any statement that supports your claim that I think only violent methods are valid.
For that response to have made sense I would have had to say some dumb absolute statement about the validity of violence and nonviolence, but I didnt.
Then what I replied to was even more bizarre and cryptic than I gave it credit for. What the hell does it mean?
No, it follows pretty clearly from your statement.
You’re being cute but I’m telling you, the FBI team monitoring your accounts across the Internet see straight through it. You’re encouraging people to forsake Gandhi’s non-violent methods and start getting violent.
Quote where I made any statement that supports your claim that I think only violent methods are valid.