Charlie Kirk’s family blamed Utah officials for failing to prevent the conservative activist’s assassination at a state university, in a wrongful death notice announced Wednesday that presages a possible lawsuit.
Attorneys for the family said Kirk’s death resulted from a string of “reckless decisions” by officials at Utah Valley University that left him exposed to a rooftop sniper, who fired a fatal shot from more than 400 feet (122 meters) away on Sept. 10, 2025. The university has faced harsh criticism for a lack of key safety measures on the day of the shooting.
Kirk, 31, had been debating students in an outdoor courtyard surrounded by tall buildings and with several thousand people in attendance. An Associated Press review following the shooting showed the campus in Orem did not use several public safety practices that have become standard safeguards at events around the country.
Campus police staffing was far below recommended levels for a school of that size. They also did not fly a drone to monitor rooftops or coordinate with local law enforcement to secure the event attended by about 3,000 people. There were no bag checks or metal detectors.
“The risk of a rooftop shooter should have been especially top-of-mind given the attempted assassination of President Trump, Charlie Kirk’s close friend and political ally, by a rooftop shooter the previous year,” Kirk family attorney D. Loren Washburn wrote in the notice to state and university officials.
The document, dated Sept. 9, a day before the one-year anniversary of Kirk’s death, is a required step under state law before his family can file a formal claim or lawsuit. It names the university and its then-president, Astrid Tuminez; the campus police department and its chief, Jeffrey Long; and the state of Utah.


Who gives a shit
Entirely too many people, it’s like you aren’t even paying attention
No, I have much better things to do with my time than to keep up with that circus
Then why ask if you don’t even want to know/have much better things to do with your time.
It’s LIKE you don’t care, yet you still engage with the thing you claim not to care about.
Very strange
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_question
You have too much time on your hands
As do you
You’re the one who engaged me because you don’t have the ability to register context clues, do something other than seek out argument.
Considering you missed the sarcasm of my original comment and we went down this path which is highly amusing to me, it’s fucking hilarious that you say I don’t have the ability to register context clues.
Keep doubling down