The backlash to Meta's AI glasses has been so fierce that the company is reportedly now working on a version with no camera.

Looks like everyone who raised awareness about “Mark Zuckerberg Pervert Glasses” ultimately made a real difference <3

    • lemming@sh.itjust.works
      26·
      1 day ago

      I assume they would still have a microphone, voice recognition, and report everything you and anyone around you do.

      • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
        3·
        15 hours ago

        Correct. If ais can fingerprint and emulate your voice with a couple of short clips, they can just as easily identify you from the sound of your voice from the same.

    • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      12·
      1 day ago

      They’re trying to flood the market with mimics to manufacture a smokescreen a la “not every set that looks like the versions with cameras actually have them” bullshit.

          • far_university1990@reddthat.com
            1·
            1 hour ago

            If cannot tell if camera or not, and camera banned, then ban all because cannot know if banned or not.

            So “smokescreen” would just get entire smoke ban too.

            Like not allowed get dull metal sword or replica in public place. Because cannot know if sharp. So cannot allow smart glasses because cannot know if camera.

            • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
              2·
              1 hour ago

              Ah, it’s a translation issue, my apologies. Regardless, the current regime (anywhere, sadly) won’t see this as a blanket statement on the tech itself, and will use it to prop up the newest version of their surveillance “for the greater good” (aka “profits”).