can@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agoknow it rule nephewsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up1107arrow-down13
arrow-up1104arrow-down1imageknow it rule nephewsh.itjust.workscan@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square29linkfedilink
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.worksOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoI don’t think they meant “use” with any negative connotation. I’m curious. Had they said “utilized” instead would that have read better to you?
minus-squaremisery mansion@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoFrom a purely grammatical perspective, yes, utilized would be a little bit less pejorative than used. But I still think Roger Taylor would object hehe
I don’t think they meant “use” with any negative connotation. I’m curious. Had they said “utilized” instead would that have read better to you?
From a purely grammatical perspective, yes, utilized would be a little bit less pejorative than used. But I still think Roger Taylor would object hehe