• West_of_West@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    Not rude, no worries. It’s an area of consternation for Canada. And a really interesting balancing act to watch.

    I think its wrong to lump the royals in with all Brits, at least Elizabeth and Charles, because they aren’t raised to view themselves as purely British. I would argue they dont identify with nation states in the same way us plebs do.

    When the royals are in Canada the media often worries that British realpolitik will prevail for exactly the reasons you’ve outlined. But I’ve yet to see Elizabeth or Charles throw Canada under the bus. When here, they do represent Canadian views, even when they are slightly contrary to British.

    Canadians generally have ‘trust’ in the monarchy because they have held up their side of the bargain. Will that always be the case? Maybe not.

    I’m probably a soft monarchist, I think there is stability in the institution that republics just don’t have. I think there is value in the elected leader being reminded they are not the top dog, even if it is a largely ceremonial role. It helps that the royals are far away and the family drama stays mostly in the UK.