• fracture@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    Ā·
    4 days ago

    i feel like we’re in agreement, except for the conclusion we arrived at about it

    i just don’t like it when people act like saying (literally) ā€œi will deadname twitterā€ will hurt twitter more than the trans people who might have actually been deadnamed. i think it’s a waste to trigger them to act like calling x ā€œtwitterā€ is a slur or smth

    • ora@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      4 days ago

      I mean that’s only true for people who actually see it as deadnaming, which it isn’t. As I said before the point isn’t actually ā€œDeadnaming is okay in this instanceā€ but ā€œThis app is literally just Twitter.ā€ Elon and supporters have called that deadnaming as some sort of gotcha and nobody argues that it isn’t because it’s not like he’s actually opposing deadnaming he dislikes the observation that he hasn’t built anything.

      • fracture@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        okay, sure, but i am a trans person and i have independently concluded that i don’t think it’s cool. sure ā€œit’s only deadnaming if you think it’s literally is the thing we’re calling itā€, but the human brain doesn’t work like that; if someone has a strong enough response to it (e.g. they suffered trauma from being deadnamed), then they’re going to have that response before they go ā€œoh actually they don’t mean it because it’s directed at a corpā€. i don’t think ā€œdunking on elon musk, who has plenty of other shit to dunk onā€ is really worth doing that to somebody

        (idk why you keep bringing up he didn’t build anything? i know? you don’t need to use the word ā€œdeadnameā€ to make that point?)

        and i’m too lazy to check every room i’m in and be like, ā€œhey, is casually pretending like we’re doing this evil shitty thing (that’s actually justified bc we’re dunking on a shithead!!) going to be a trigger for you?ā€ (which, honestly, would still be better than just assuming it’s fine)

        (if it’s not clear, my issue is more with people who literally use the phrase ā€œi’m going to deadname twitterā€ or ā€œthe only time it’s OK to deadname something is twitterā€ or whatever)

        it’s like… look, there’s a reason we put actual deadnaming content behind a content warning. i’m basically treating it the same way, because even if it is not the literal act of deadnaming a real person, it’s still pretending that something traumatic and evil is a cool and normal thing to do, which i do not fuck with, even in jest