Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 28 天前Microsoft Teams users are extremely angry at new banner asking them to paywww.neowin.netexternal-linkmessage-square147linkfedilinkarrow-up1598arrow-down14
arrow-up1594arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft Teams users are extremely angry at new banner asking them to paywww.neowin.netLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 28 天前message-square147linkfedilink
minus-squareCanIFishHere@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·27 天前What was your Boss’ feedback? Why didn’t he/she like your recommendation? I’m going to guess a major constraint was too many sources for software.
minus-squareLordCrom@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·27 天前Basically, if they went with IBM and it broke, its IBM’s fault If they went open source and it broke, its our fault for picking it.
minus-squareCanIFishHere@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·27 天前Liability for one’s product actually means something to IBM/Microsoft/etc. instead of some guy on github.
minus-squareGirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·27 天前I mean, they are probably running RedHat or Debian on their servers anyway, so if it’s reliable enough for them, then it’s reliable enough for clients.
What was your Boss’ feedback? Why didn’t he/she like your recommendation? I’m going to guess a major constraint was too many sources for software.
Basically, if they went with IBM and it broke, its IBM’s fault
If they went open source and it broke, its our fault for picking it.
Liability for one’s product actually means something to IBM/Microsoft/etc. instead of some guy on github.
I mean, they are probably running RedHat or Debian on their servers anyway, so if it’s reliable enough for them, then it’s reliable enough for clients.