Yes because voting is literally the bare minimum you do. We have first past the post, make sure the least shitty candidate is past the post AND then keep working to fix things, keep working to get better candidates in the next primary.
If Kamala Harris had been elected, we could be protesting for meaningful action in Gaza, meaningful climate action. Instead, those issues have become buried by all the tremendous waves of shit flying out of the republicans.
Yes, I would, but short of overthrowing the government which is highly dependent on both the material realities of the time and the amount willing to do so, it is objectively the better option
So you dont have alarm bells going off in your head that you would willingly vote for a literal Holocaust?
Yes because voting is literally the bare minimum you do. We have first past the post, make sure the least shitty candidate is past the post AND then keep working to fix things, keep working to get better candidates in the next primary.
If Kamala Harris had been elected, we could be protesting for meaningful action in Gaza, meaningful climate action. Instead, those issues have become buried by all the tremendous waves of shit flying out of the republicans.
Yes, I would, but short of overthrowing the government which is highly dependent on both the material realities of the time and the amount willing to do so, it is objectively the better option
Then I dont think we have much more to discuss. You would vote for a literal Holocaust.
^ this is a dumb’s person notion of winning an argument
^ this is a holocaust supporter’s notion of winning an argument
You think the argument is over and you won because you invoked a word.
Do better.
Your version ends in even more death. As I said, dumb all around