• krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 days ago

      Yep. And it’s going to keep getting better.

      This, imo, is what AI is great for. It costs nothing, it makes no money, it entertains people.

        • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 days ago

          In this case, sure, but there are many models you’d a run locally with a decent gou that can produce similar if not better results.

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 days ago

          The shipping industry emits a billion tons of CO2e per year. Training a model emits… maybe a thousand? An impact that could be offset by reducing Chinese imports by 0.0001%. Or arbitrarily limited by strong-arming the very few companies involved. DeepSeek knocked off a few orders of magnitude and R1 seems to work, as well as any of these things work.

          Now, it is a problem locally, where datacenters double power and water use for any given county. Anything like a tiny sliver of the global shipping industry becomes noticeable when it’s concentrated in one building within range of a commute.

          But local models can’t be worse than playing a video game. And if remote models use ten times more, it’s only as bad as a round of DOTA.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          This is true, but to be fair we’ve been pushing that accelerator long before AI was even close to a thing. It’s a problem, but it’s hardly the only one that we could stop doing… and we won’t stop any of them, based on history so far.