Not using WindowsOS/MacOS is a very big step for them and FOSS

so please don’t care that much about distros :) and see the bright side: They are not using WindowsOS/MacOS

this is great

No problem, in a world of rising zero-click searches/content :( you are a rare find

this is just 5% of microslop

I don’t know what this means

but MicroG is not using Google as a location provier

and it’s not connecting Google servers for location

https://github.com/microg/GmsCore/wiki/Google-Network-Connections

First, the “spamming” seems to be about not uploading their own apps to F-Droid, which is a fair concern given a lot of the apps’ permissions.

• source: a spammy github account

Sure they post the same stuff, but that could be literally anyone.

I don’t think you read my post or look at this links, until then I don’t care what you’re saying

Thank you. It’s good to know there are still people who read, research, and criticize. 😇

I agree we should look into it, but I don’t have much time. This is what I found. More proof is better, but less proof doesn’t mean it’s not proof.

thats great :)

thanks for explanation, it’s bad I mean opposite, I’m still learning English

isn’t debunking mean revealing bad truth?

deleted by creator

I still can’t forget Google Search Reddit fiasco 😂

I think expert software developers can quickly address AI code

btw this is happening actuallt AI trained on copyrighted material and it’s repeating similar or sometimes verbatim copies but license-free :D

ok troll I’m debunking your whole operation this is not shithub you can’t have a free hand here

https://lemmy.zip/post/59056692

Backups/copies is essential ✓

I think Firefox’s usage is more, Proton Mail is less, Addy.io is more, DuckDuckGo Email Alias is less, DuckDuckGo search usage is more, Matrix is more (btw Matrix is not app :D), Bitwarden is less, Obsidian is more (unfortunately it’s closed-source), uBO is more, Windscribe is more, AI usage is more

why Proton??

GraphaneOS founder has fetish for Chromium and he hates F-Droid 1

tldr: he accuse f-droid not being secure and citing this bs post https://privsec.dev/posts/android/f-droid-security-issues/ and he promotes accrescent.app

• they contain closed-source app
• they have very flawed understanding of open-source and security 2, 3

here is some examples:

Open source doesn’t necessarily mean more secure. I’m aware of many open source apps with numerous well-known security vulnerabilities, as well as many closed-source apps that are highly secure. Furthermore, Accrescent will have a filter to, for example, show only open source apps, so your treatment is incomprehensible.

Accrescent doesn’t claim to serve only open-source apps and never has out of the belief that an app’s source model doesn’t inherently make it more or less private or secure. Qlango doesn’t violate any explicit or implicit Accrescent policy by the properties you listed, so it would be inappropriate to remove it.

…In addition, “trackers” are subjective. Accrescent has no plans to enumerate specific libraries or classes and blacklist them solely based on the fact that they connect to Google, Amazon, etc.; collect analytics; or contain proprietary code. This approach isn’t scalable anyway because it is trivial to bypass such detection methods.

So I take everything GraphaneOS says with a grain of salt